[An...] Posted September 7, 2022 Share Posted September 7, 2022 _____ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted September 7, 2022 Share Posted September 7, 2022 I think you are taking it from wrong direction. First of all - usual usage of pins like this would be to position something or to help with torque. BUT both pieces ( not pin ) are faced together ( bases for perpendicularity ) so only pin and hole will have problems to fit to each other - perpendicularity on pin and hole takes care for it. Next - it doesn't matter if designer write tolerace class ( like f7 ) - he can ommit it and write just max/min - same for hole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[An...] Posted September 7, 2022 Author Share Posted September 7, 2022 _____ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted September 7, 2022 Share Posted September 7, 2022 Thanks for replying by image - i enjoyed rewriting it to get translation 🤣 Still this does not cover your concerns nor application/usage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[An...] Posted September 14, 2022 Author Share Posted September 14, 2022 _____ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted September 14, 2022 Share Posted September 14, 2022 Such big effort, time spent and you are still wrong. If you want to apply 16f7 and 16H5, then apply perpendicularity | 0 (M) | Nowhere at this figure 9-13 is present tolerated dimension for hole. Only pin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in