All Activity

If it's about scanning around sharp edges, than insert a corner point with 45° vector, or ask for model, where will be small radius. And if you need to have as many points close to that corner, then make new segment for that area and scan it with much slower speed. In that case don't forget to select all segments and change them into one group so you can have continuous scan.

If it is a result issue mask curve points using the evaluation parameters option at the area where the probe will be scanning around the corner.

Any tricks for scanning around features the have a couple 90 degree corners?

Change your vectors. i=0, j=0,k=1

Ok, i see now what this takes. I constructed a point put in all my nominals for the hole. I did the self centering and that worked. My other question is say i just want go and pick up 10 holes and just probe them like i said and get the location. But if i probe it in the Z straight up and down and it is putting my probe point as shown. How to correct this? I have to be making this harder than it seems. This is what i will be doing is just going over each hole no CAD and referencing the print nominals with each points i take for each individual holes.

All fixed, Thank you Charlie!

Greetings, We have an in-house script that automatically extracts major and minor strain data from Zeiss Inspect, generating time-dependent CSV files. Currently, we can only extract data when using the Standard computational method. I would like to develop a methodology that allows us to extract more points, as the surface quality is significantly better. If someone can help us it would be great. Best regards export_2019_BATCH_med_major_minor_minorSR_majorSR_220718.py

Similar concept to - CALYPSO: Self Center Probing with the addition of a position characteristic

This can occur after unexpected disconnects from the machine for example PC reboot, power outage, etc. To restore the machine tab connection within CALYPSO follow this guide. CALYPSO: Restoring a Machine Tab that Disappeared in CMM Settings

Recently when starting our O-Inspect863 it only starts in Simulation. The attached photo shows only the Simulation Tab in the CMM settings but the Equip folder Has the O-inspect 863 folder but it isn't being acknowledged by the software. I tried copying the O-inspect folder from my offline laptop, but it wasn't recognized. Anyone else run into a situation like this? Thank you.

Hello everyone This is my first post in the forum, thanks in advantage. The forum have been very usefull in the past I am sure Itll be on the future as well. I am running a 15x15 pallet´, as I´m working with a O-Inspect using vision so it takes less than a minute per part, quite fast, but with so many parts, it is taking so much time. I need to reduce the running time. In between every part, the progarms stops to print the report, I am looking for a way to obtain only one report at the end of the run with all the measures. I already kwon what type of report i want, I just need to know how to configurate it. Does anyone know how to do it? Thanks everyone.

If the probe is larger than your ID, then you probably want to use self centering point (inside of the point Strategy), and use the "Midpoint" Evaluation

Quick question, i have small ID's and no probe small enough to scan the inside of them. I do know that i can use a gage pin to help this question i have. But, i have been approached and asked if there is a way to use a larger probe to find the location of said smaller ID's with just one probing point to find location/center of ID's. There is 1,285 ID's and it will be programming by taking each ID manually. There is no Cad to help with this, the print is from originally 1956 and last updated was 2004. I am drawing a blank but i believe its either self centering or 4 point diameter function i can use, maybe not? Thank you for any information/direction anyone has on this topic.

🤣🤣🤣 Voll auf die Zwölf! Und dann bitte auch noch eins mit Adolf Tegtmeier als KI-Sprecher 😂

Hallo zusammen, die Genauigkeit von 0.01mm ist mit dem µCMM von Bruker Alicona kein Problem, wenn das Bauteil nicht zu groß ist. Ausgewertet wird der Datensatz mit Alicona/Zeiss Inspect, ich kann hier gerne weiterhelfen.

Well, it was definitely these 2 switches that I circled... I came in this morning, and they let the mast move freely. My best guess is that the humidity (I just learned that it got up to 55% in that room...) was causing the problem.

When I had a similar error, if not the same, it was due to PCM, an array not calculating because it was setup wrong.

Hi Martin, thanks for confirming my apprehension, that kiosk mode is a little bit on the shallow side in terms of functionality.

For this i skipped kiosk and made a python script to make evaluation easier ( filling header, storin measured data, pdf report ) If you want to evaluate many of the same part, then you have to use stages and report edited for stages. This will allow you to have one column just for actuals. But deviations and graphical representation of tolerance band will always be only for active stage.

Report flatness, but datum A will be tangential element ( which should be anyways )

This is not valid modifier for shape requirements. How it's currently specified, you would evaluate flatness of the associated plane, which will always have deviation of 0. Speak to design if you have that option.

Hello, we have a AtosQ attached to a Scanport. I am trying to build processes, that are actually fast and foolproof for non admin users, so i am having a look at the kiosk mode. So far - even for very simple parts - it is not really an option, because i can`t find a way to implement a kiosk-program, that is not overall way slower, than just starting inspect in two instances one for capturing the meshes and one for the evaluation of the stages. The challenges i face: After every part i have to start from the beginning: Serialnr., temperature etc. Is there a way to to get a prompt for the number of parts/stages that have to be measured? Is there a way to get all parts into one report? Thank you in advance for your input.

Hallo zusammen, gibt es schon evtl. die Eistellung für: Quader Größe der automatischen Selektion beim polygonisieren einstellen? VG Alexander Eichholz Metallgießerei W-Funke

Wie lässt sich die im Bild dargestellte Zeichnungsanforderung mittels ZEISS Inspect Optical 3D umsetzen?

Hello, please make sure the WebView2 component is installed: Microsoft Edge WebView2 | Microsoft Edge Developer (evergreen variant)