All Activity

Haven't thought of that, and I would not know how to apply it in v2022. Is this a capability that v2025 has?

I just had this happen when closing a measurement plan that I had opened to demonstrate some unrelated UI stuff. There was a stuck Piweb process that I killed in task manager, which got rid of that waiting window. I'm not sure I would do that if I had actually been running parts, though.

You are looking at Views, not measurements. Attached is a CAD Cube PMI example.

The PCM scripts create files in locations you decide (The drive and path). It creates folders if they do not exist. It places files in the folders created or existing. It will never overwrite a file due to the Date and Time stamp appended to the file name. It is also based on user information in the "Definition of Multiple Report" section. I use: Drawing No. Incremental Part Number (Used as a counter and or serial numbers) Order Start Comment (in case you want to add a comment) Workpiece Rev. (Used for drawing revision) All of these are part of the variables in the script I attached in my prior post.

@Richard Stanich

https://portal.zeiss.com/knowledge-base?id=587980

Hello na-vor we had a post in forum explaining the Bfex failing, here is link

Hallo Nano, Ich hatten auch guten Support durch dich 👍. Wir hatten schon öfters Kontakt über die Hotline..."EGO" Grüße

Yes, but there are still some commands that absolutely require the PCM license (read/runPCMFile being the main one)

Experts, how to convert Calypso programs into PC-DMIS ?

Hi Jerry, please reach out to your local support with this error Get in touch with our team | ZEISS Industrial Quality Solutions Nanno

Marc - Good idea but didn't help. Thomas - Agree.

nice, so we can write some PCM code without licence

Hi all, there is also a free webinar: PMI in metrology It is not software specific and should give you a good idea of the whole process. Nanno

Hi Peter, please also have a look at this article about MMR: ZEISS Quality Tech Guide With MMR you are analysing an assembly situation, so if the Diameter is out of tolerance, it will simply not fit - there is no "additional tolerance" left for the position -> it's calculated. If nothing else is displayed on the drawing, linear size with min/max local size would be the standard. ISO uses the extracted surface. If you are interested, you can create the check with high tolerances, so you can create and calculate it and switch between extracted surface and associated element to see the difference in the tolerance zone (make sure to show the tolerance/virtual condition in the properties of the positional check). There is an AUKOM GD&T training available. We also offer an Inspect specific GD&T training. This is more about the use of the software, for basics I would recommend the AUKOM training and soon there will be an introduction training for technical drawings. But for GD&T basics I think AUKOM is most suitable. Nanno

For me it happens in regular programming

I am not sure your question. For a Cylinder with (E) - i think for ISO it should be envelope diameter for outside and LP for inner side. On your screenshot you have both tolerances evalated as tangential element. The most logical would be that your tolerance bonus would come from inscribed diameter, since it's the biggest diameter of a pin which can go through ( on your measurement 15,845 ).

I got this message too. For me, it happened when the program launched via Autorun. Since applying the patch, the message has gone away, though I don't know if that's the reason.

Thank you for the link, Martin. Based on the video, it seems that the ISO approach is to use the extracted surface. However, when I create a cylinder using either the envelope principle or the independency principle, the cylinder still has to be within a certain tolerance. Does this apply to both envelope calculation methods? That doesn't really make sense to me. Could you please help me understand this as well? Thank you.

Hi all Does anybody else experience extremely slow saving times when saving a measurement plan? The program reports that it´s "Waiting for PiWeb reporting" and it takes forever to finish.

In general (and for more you have to give information), there are only two possibilities: the parts dont match The maschine "doesnt know where the part is" aka the aligments dont match. For 2. Check the coordinate systems you use, how you manipulate/save and recall them, espescially if you are using loops.

According to AI for ISO you should use Associated element. But i agree there is not much of description what to use and what it's doing. https://www.gdandtbasics.com/iso-vs-asme-position-tolerance/

Danke hat der vom Support mir auch gesagt. Ich hatte es in der Vergangenheit schon gelesen gehabt. Dachte mir aber es sei behoben.

Hi, I’ve recently started using O-Inspect and have a question. I completed the program to inspect my part using the optic/camera, but after changing the part and performing a manual alignment, it seemed to lose position and were no longer correctly oriented to measure the next part. Could someone please help me understand what I might have done wrong?

Hello Mike, thank you for sending the tech guide. However, I couldn't find all the information I was looking for. I wanted to ask if you could provide some additional details, as I couldn't find some of the information in the standard either, and I'm starting to get a bit lost. Specifically, I'm interested in the ISO standard, as I don't work with ASME. If I want to enable the MMR condition, do I need to create a cylindrical hole using either the envelope requirement or the independency principle? Also, should I be using the extracted surface or the associated element? If I use the associated element, does that mean I have to switch from ISO to ASME? Thank you for your response, P.