All Activity

I came back from vacation and the CMM was not used while away, Windows on my desktop was updated for 1/2 hour and now Calypso doesn't produce a PiWeb report. I am not drawing any conclusions from the Windows update but that was one thing I can think of that could possibly affect the operation. Is there anything I can do to fix that? The report is always automatic, I believe I had it set correctly years ago, never changed it since. I wonder if there is anything I can do to fix it.

If i remember correctly, there was an option to store anything into folder "inspection/MEASUREMENT_PLAN/dataForPiWeb" and it was stored into it. But i never tested it. So running BAT while protocol is not ready, importing some info into that folder, could theoreticaly import into database those files.

Has anyone continued working on this without the use of PCM? We are looking to add something similar as Kartsen, where we would like to add data from a hand-held device to our reports. We have several CMMs but we only have 1 PCM license on our main PC, so we cannot use the readPCMFile or runPCMFile functions on our CMMs.

Check if you have enabled PDF printout and what settings is used for path.

Hi everyone, I have been trying to get the MSA 1 sheet to give me values for CG and CGK but can't seem to figure it out... Can someone please point me in the right direction?

That's right! It was marking things it shouldn't have... Thanks a lot, Sven!

Refer here - Excel Report User Defined fields - General Discussion - ZEISS Qualityforum

hi the option is not masking, i know it sound strange but to hide in report u need to activate marking (Marcar). in the first window ocultar should be activated

To do it the way you want, you need to select the option one step down—"Mark," not "Mask." Alternatively, right-click directly on your inspection characteristic and select "Mask" there.

Good morning, everyone. Even after following these steps, a feature that I have selected as masked is still appearing in the report. Could someone tell me what I'm doing wrong? Thank you very much.

Hello, here’s an update on the issue. I recreated the position and created a new one using the polar position in the new Best Fit. I also applied the representation in polar coordinates in advance on the feature side, but I’m still getting the same result: the graph remains empty. Any ideas what could be causing this?

Hi all, Please guide me how add additional header in excel report

https://portal.zeiss.com/knowledge-base?id=552028 There are no issues running from a network as long as you have Calypso setup correctly. Quick fix. 🙂

Hi everyone, I have been trying to get the MSA 1 sheet to give me values for CG and CGK but can't seem to figure it out... Can someone please point me in the right direction?

A small correction to this: of the two commands, the visible inspections are considered, not all visible elements in general.

The metrology technician should be provided with a script that is executed before the "publication" of a project and which checks the project for various things. One of the checks should be whether the project is fully calculated, so that no project is stored in an "undefined" state, so to speak.

Also Änderungen innerhalb der mit Autorun betriebenen Prüfpläne erscheinen natürlich sofort nach der Änderung, denn die werden ja bei jedem Messungsstart neu geladen. Was sich ohne Neustart nicht ändert, sind Änderungen in der Autorun-Oberfläche selbst, also z.B. Bilder und Texte in den Icons. Es kann aber eventuell sein, daß für eine Aktualisierung der Daten des aktuell laufenden Prüfplans zuerst der Start eines anderen Prüfplans nötig ist, bevor die Daten beim nächsten Start wieder neu geladen werden. Diesen Spezialfall habe ich noch nie untersucht, weil sowas (also das Ändern eines Prüfplans, der gerade benutzt wird) bei uns sehr selten bis nie vorkommt.

Even if Calypso would allow to have different dimensions in the SSC and the imported PCF, I wouldn't reccommend to do that. Why? Because all the movements of the CMM are done based on the "actual" values in the stylus database, but collision detection is done with the SSC model data. Having different values here could lead to false (or missed) collision warnings. Imagine your "actual" stylus is 0.1 mm shorter than the SSC model. If Calypso touches a point on a surface based on the actual data, the tip of the SSC would already bump into the surface while the "actual" tip would barely touch it. Simulation would register this as a collision.

Hi Mihael, Thank you! Works well 🙂

Yeah all the programs are on a shared network, I have already read about people having problems with this, so Ill be making sure any programs being worked on wont be currently being ran, this will mainly be for creating new programs on a time crunch, but if needed i might edit the program from a different location so ill make sure they arent running that program. Thanks for the heads up!

Hello, Please see the attached article for further assistance if needed. https://portal.zeiss.com/knowledge-base?id=3926896

Hi I don't create a new topic, I ask in this How to measurment a this dimension? I know about a caliper distance but is there another option? I mean a dimension 111.4. I read about Continuous curve distance to use, but I dont know what is name in my language. Can You explain on video or pic of "Continuous curve distance" and how use that? If this a wrong method tell me. Its about to measurment iregular, non symetrical form. Thanks

I'm pretty sure Nvidia only makes those profile presets available on their workstation product line. We accidentally quoted replacement PCs for our shop equipment that had Geforce GPUs instead of Quadros or whatever they're being called now and I don't have the preset list available, but as far as I know we have not had any crashing problems on them.

Interesting, every driver release I've seen has a drop-down where you can select the Autodesk compatible settings. Can you monitor the temperatures and CPU/GPU usage when simulation is running? Memory too, CTDs often happen when the system runs out of memory and has to use swap. I think I've read that Microsoft started to enable Memory Integrity security setting by default in recent updates, which tends to be performance intensive. And as usual, if you have some third party AV it might be messing with the processes. That's all I can think of right now.