All Activity

Moin, Wir haben mehrere PiWeb Protokolle für eine Messung. Z.B. Fertigung, Kunde, Übersicht ,Kurzform, Merkmalsgruppe X usw. Manche werden nur angezeigt, manche wiederum als pdf abgelegt. In der Endung zu *.pdf wird von CALYPSO/PiWeb automatisch die Nummer des protokolls aus der Auswahl "Definition Mehrfachprotokolle" hinzugefügt. Am Ende des Dateinamens wird dann "(1).pdf" für das erste Protokoll und "*(3).pdf" für das dritte Protokoll als Endung angefügt. Gibt es eine Variable in PiWeb die diesen index zur Verfügung stellt? Danke und Gruß Karsten

I found that using "edit_creation_parameters" is more uniformly than using "edit_properties" Here is example of editing creation parameters for diameter of a circle and TP of a circle with editing only tolerance gom.script.sys.edit_creation_parameters ( element=gom.app.project.inspection['Kružnice 1.Ø'], tolerance={'lower': -0.5, 'tolerance_type': 'two_sided_center', 'upper': 0.6}) gom.script.sys.edit_creation_parameters ( element=gom.app.project.inspection['Kružnice 1.Poloha'], tolerance=1.2) Here is example of edit properties - there is tolerance named differently - tol_dimension / tol_gdat gom.script.sys.edit_properties ( data=[gom.app.project.inspection['Kružnice 1.Ø']], tol_dimension_lower=-0.9, tol_dimension_lower_warn=0.0, tol_dimension_upper=0.9, tol_dimension_upper_warn=0.0, tol_dimension_use_lower=True, tol_dimension_use_upper=True, tol_dimension_use_warn_level=False, tol_template='') gom.script.sys.edit_properties ( data=[gom.app.project.inspection['Kružnice 1.Poloha']], tol_gdat_upper=1.4, tol_template='')

So our setup is like this: bottom IP is projected from ATOS before connecting.

Hallo zusammen, ich hole das Thema mal aus der Versenkung. Ist es möglich die Tabelle so zu editieren, dass die Stufennamen in Spalte 1 untereinander angezeigt werden und der eine Messwert daneben in Spalte 2? Bzw. ein zweiter Messwert in Spalte 3 usw... MfG Martin

Ich muss Größe und Position messen. Leider funktioniert die Option "selbstzentriertes Antasten " mit der Duramax nicht.

I am trying to measure the thickness at a few locations on the web of an H-beam specimen. I would like to create measurement points by entering their coordinates. Since these coordinates are idealized, the points will not necessarily lie exactly on the web surface. Is there a way to project these points onto the web surface (or snap them to the nearest surface) and then obtain the local thickness at those projected locations? I am very new to the software, so if you could explain the steps in detail, I would really appreciate it. Thanks!

Thank you, Did not know Geometry was an option. For the distance I used the second option, not familiar with curves in GOM Inspect, I do use curves all the time in Calypso so I'll have to spend some time learning them with Inspect

In the new custom elements feature (https://zeiss.github.io/zeiss-inspect-app-api/2026/howtos/custom_elements/custom_nominals_actuals.html), is it possible to create an element based on a point selection in the 3D view? For example, let's say I want to implement a RANSAC based fitting circle. I want the user to select points from a cross-section, rather than simply providing the whole section element, which I will then run RANSAC on. Is that possible with the current 2026 software? Thanks!

For TP i would suggest Geometry norm. For that distance - there can be many ways: line from centers of those two circles - then intersection line/circle with mode: curve section - then two touch point ( disc ) on selection and projected on section instead of mesh

Not actual part, just image off the web. Cannot show print. 1) Drawing has a true position of the small diameter, I created a cylinder and when I generate the Position it shows a 7mm deviation in the results. The cylinder diameter and X.Y location are less than 50 microns off. 2) How to get the radius to radius dimension? (blue arrow) Thanks

I can try it out on 2025 tomorrow. What are conditions for selection?

Automotive and sheetmetal could always create their planes used for sectioning using no measuring principle or As Actual, then section cuts could always be Reference geometry. I know of 3 programmers that made this mistake and this poster was on that road. And I still believe all section cuts should get alignments automatically...if some industry wants it otherwise then allow for a user preference toggle. Yea, yea, I know how to set us custom principles, but so do other industry programmers. Ill probably add this request to my voice.

Yall may have misunderstood me. Let's assume you have 10 programs that are all identical except they are different parts numbers....now the customer changes the tolerances. You can open all 10 programs and change the tolerances 1 by 1, or you can record yourself doing it once, then loop thru all programs and save them. When you record a tolerance change for a diameter or distance it works when you play the script, But if you record and run a tolerance change on a profile or position check it won't change it at all.

Oh, I see. I was using Recall, Not Recall Feature Points. Thanks!

I haven't thought about posting any. I have deleted more than I can recall from other forums.

@Richard Stanich, make more videos about Calypso programming. Youtube or other platform perhaps?

recalled the measured points into a circle and set the evaluation of the circle to outer tangential

tangential circle?

I would recall measured points into tangential circle. Otherwise make intersections with circles to get quadrant and recall circle from 4 points

Im pretty sure I have done this before, but I am not recalling how. I have a part with four radii, 45° spacing on a Ø6.62 periphery of the radii. Creating a BC from the center of each radii, easy-peasy. How do I get the periphery diameter?

Short video of my Master Sphere setup. 1 thru 5 are all 30mm Master Spheres, 6 is an 8mm Master Sphere. Each one you create can be assigned an orientation (Inclination Angle, Rotation Angle), as seen in the short video. From this, if I have Master Spheres 1 thru 4 setup on the CMM and a Star probe with 4 tips (-X, +X, -Y, +Y) I can assign each stylus tip to a specific Master Probe by its Number assignment. When you run an Automatic Qualification, the built-in routine will run each stylus tip to its respectively assigned Master Sphere when you manually qualified each tip. Clearance Distance is established for each individual Master Sphere in the "Clearance Distance dialog". In my case, the Clearance Distance is the same for all Master Spheres. Master Spheres.mp4

Sphere coverage would be for scanning ref. sphere - but tensor is ignoring that number and is doing 180° anyways. I am not sure about taper angle - once i am doing aquisition of ref. sphere, then i am setting up some angles.

I have another question, I believe i don't understand the "Sphere coverage" and "Taper angle" for the probes when qualifying against the reference sphere. Based on my understanding, a "180" sphere coverage would mean the probe covers half of the reference sphere right? Yet i have a probe that physically could not reach below my current reference sphere (its a probe facing to the left, pretty small ruby and the shaft is facing upward really close to the ruby.) yet the sphere coverage for that probe is also set to 180. Am i not understanding "Sphere coverage" and "Taper angle" correctly? I can take photos if it would help you all to understand

Do you need to measure the size? Or can you do a self centering point?