All Activity

Good morning, is there a way to link CALYPSO reports to an Excel file? I have created a table where I would like to report passed and failed parts, and link it directly to the CALYPSO program. Thank you."

Hi Matthew, it looks like there has been made a change within the Probe Tab, please double check if the RDS -> XXT is selected or if it has been changed to "Zeiss Fixed Mounting" If you have an RDS on your CMM and change it to another system it could overwrite your config (and delete all Stylus Systems) if you confirm it twice in these windows. Since you have 2 Contura Tabs on the bottom, make sure that only 1 has the automatic connection enabled. Best Regards Marcel

Kiosk uses dialogs "embedded in script", so create your dialogs this way for easy copying into your CustomPatches script. It should also be possible to copy the dialog description from the .gdlg and paste it into a dialog definition in the CustomPatches script. Easiest workflow might be: Create a custom patch for the start dialog using the generator and then just change the generated dialog as you want. If you want to stick with .gdlg, you can also try to replace the dialog create command in CustomPatches and use the .gdlg. I'm not absolutely sure though, if .gdlg dialogs are fully compatible with the embedded ones.

Hello Tom, the selections are also parametric, so they should work in another project without problem. In a quick test it worked for me also with replacing the CAD. There are some limits when replacing the CAD though, if the new CAD differs too much. Selections of nominals might not be carried over and curves may lose some information for example. There should be hints in the project guide. There is a function Operations -> Elements -> Adapt to CAD, which might be needed in your case. Also make sure the used point is created fully parametric with feasible measuring principles. If this does not help, please reach out to local support with the project so we can analyse it. Nanno

Hallo zusammen, vielen Dank für euren Vorschlag. Wir sind inzwischen selbständig schon relativ weit gekommen. Ich habe aktuell noch folgendes Problem: 1. Für die DFQ-Ausgabe sollte ja einmalig ein vollständiger Prüfplanablauf geschrieben werden. Wir haben bei einigen Teilen aber Prüfmerkmalsgruppen im Einsatz, die es nicht ermöglichen "Alle Prüfmerkmale" ablaufen zu lassen. Gibt es irgendwo die Möglichkeit, eine vollständige Datei auf Basis "Alle Prüfmerkmale" mit Beispieldaten zu generieren? 2. Bspw. ist der Prüfer K0008 der angemeldete Benutzer in Calypso (das nutzen wir nicht) Für das CAQ wird das Feld K1223 (Prüfnernummer) benötigt. Wie werden grundsätzlich solche Kataloge eingerichtet? Über die Userfields.ini? Vielen Dank im Voraus.

chaine en francais, = top

Hallo Herr Kankowski, ich habe dieses Verhalten als Fehler in unserem System hinterlegt. Ein möglicher Workaround besteht darin, ein Textelement mit derselben Systemvariable außerhalb der Tabelle zu platzieren. Das Textelement verfügt über eine Eigenschaft, mit der es im Monitor nicht angezeigt wird, oder Sie können die Schriftfarbe auf transparent setzen.

also just downloaded the latest 2021 GP from portal, I realize it is no longer supported.

wellp, uninstall / reinstall no worky here. I tried repair first, back'ed up the GearNT folder. got rid of entire acis folder then tried uninstall /reinstall I even managed to make sure port 9996 is open using cmd code to get around IT security, it seemed to work and show it was open listening, services file is mapped right to port GEARACIS 9996/tcp I could see if Calypso and Gear Pro were using same version of ACIS, however our GR is v31 and Calypso is v32 Acis.

How would that work if one of the feature is a cylinder?

found this post from 2023 : reinstall may work ...

It could be the case that when you sliced the model and generated the curve it overlapped on an existing wireframe. Then when you picked the curve, you accidently clicked the line. If that's the case, try moving the curve up or down off of any existing wireframe and pick it again to see if that error repeats.

Yeah, they are straight lines. Thank you.

CAD>CAD MODEL CONTROL>SHOW PROBING OBJECT This isn't a direct fix to your issue, but it may help with troubleshooting actual to virtual in where Calypso has projected the styli to be. This has aided me in the past when I was experiencing similar alignment issues.

I see this happen when the "Curve" or a section of the curve is a straight 2d line. I ignore it.

It's been a long time since I have worked with curve. I sectioned my model to create a yellow line where I want a 2D curve. I clicked on the yellow line to turn it red. I clicked on Curve and a 2D curve is created. When I open the feature and then close it, I get a message "The nominal points lie exactly on a line which is not allowed. Please use a 2D line or a 3D curve.". Any idea why that is? I have a feeling I am forgetting something.

Then you could use symmetry point ( not in Construction as Symmetry construction ) - should work with recalled measured point. At least you can try it

Anyone ever have this message re-occur several times over months? What cause it and how do I fix it?

Yes, The best method I have right now is only able to create a center point between the radius and the plane. If there is a better way to represent the datum it would be great.

Has anyone had any luck with creating a live part dashboard of what's been running through their cmm's for different numbers? Similar to minitabs display.

Do you need MMB on datum C?

PSA: Service Pack 8.0.12 just dropped. Downloading now, will see if I can import SSC correctly in it.

I've tried something - not sure if it's ok, but i've used CYL_A as last one. You can also check PLN_A and/or PLN_B as >< to control only rotation, which would suite for PLN_C. But i agree it's not correct or straightforward as in Calypso.

If you have a part close to machine limits and you have VAST XT for example and probes which is shorter than probe head, then it will move further. Please specify your setup further 🙂

getting same issue at one of our site with GP 2021. There is a KB article .. https://portal.zeiss.com/knowledge-base?id=1353838 However ours is set up exactly as shown. We are on windows 10, and I'm thinking a windows update could have blocked this port or more likely I.T. security. It appears there is an inbound rule to allow it to open on ours, however when I ping open ports I see Calypso is listening but 9996 or Gear Pro acis is not open or listening. Following to see any progress, but our next step is to upgrade to 2023 and Win 11, then our I.T. Dept can help us. Out of curiosity do you have any issues with running multiple parts? I can seem to only run one part then Gear Pro seems to crash and I have to shut down PC. A restart doesn't even fix it. Good luck !