All Activity

I have to agree with @Dinko Sabo. Tom, you said that you marked up the drawing (I'm guessing for IP confidentiality reasons), but I'm also guessing you didn't add the 'Ⓤ0' to the 0.05 for the line with the Dynamic profile tolerance modifier. If I'm correct in that, and the original print said 0.05Ⓤ0△ on one line, the 'Ⓤ0' contradicts the '△', meaning the designer has not utilized the dynamic profile tolerance modifier correctly. If, on the other hand, the line is actually 0.05△, then this could be the same concept as the example in Figure 11-37 of the 2018 standard, in which a wider-tolerance-zone profile is used to control the size and location of the surface, and a narrower-tolerance-zone dynamic profile is used to control the form. (The example in the standard is explicit in the caption that it is a two-single-segment profile tolerance. I don't even see anywhere the standard addresses the possibility of performing refinements in a composite profile tolerance FCF, though I can see why one might want to do that.)

I really didn't want to complain because I've been happy with the changes so far; However, I really don't like the black and white buttons. But you're going the wrong direction @Jeff Frodermann, we don't want modern looking buttons. We want to go back to vintage looking buttons. Something with some character. Modern design kills me. It's like modern design's goal is to turn everything into a grey cube. Like it's goal is to suck your soul. Maybe I'm being a bit hyperbolic, but can't we all agree the black and white overly simple buttons are not great.

@Edward Musgrave, the user interface, *especially* the current black-and-white icons, desperate needs modernization and improvement. If you chart the suggestions on MyVoice by category, greater than 80% relate to the user experience and GUI.

Floundering in their sense of mine, like fish in the puddles of a dried-up stream. They hold on to anger as if grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at another. But they are the ones that get burned. For thousands of candles can be lit from a single candle, and the life of the candle will not be shortened. Pay no attention to the faults of others, things done or left undone by others. Consider only what oneself is done or left undone. Happiness never decreases by being shared. Go forth, Zeiss, in every direction for the happiness, the harmony, the welfare of the many and share your knowledge. It is a way to achieve immortality. For power is gained by sharing knowledge, not hoarding it. If a man by causing pain to others, wishes to obtain pleasure for himself, he, entangled in the bonds of selfishness, will never be free from hatred. For by these transgressions, it is easier for a hardcopy of the cookbook to go through the eye of a needle than for Zeiss, who is rich, to enter the kingdom of Metrology.

OK - then yes, always wrap the input in quotes.

This is my go-to method, I keep a copy of the original CAD model just in case. I don't bother trouble shooting when it happens, I just replace the model.

I am using all of them as a string.

Please do not change the icons again. OMG I cannot find anything if you keep changing the road signs.

Cory, Say whatttt is right. You still have the physical relic from the ancient days when you sat in a classroom with the legendary Tom Oakes and flipped actual pages like some kind of measurement monk. That book has seen things. It has coffee stains. It has dog-eared corners on the filter chapters. It has the quiet dignity of a warrior who survived the pre-digital era. And now you stand before us, eyes wide, realizing that somewhere out there exists a PDF… a searchable, CTRL+F-able, no-more-flipping version of the sacred ZEISS Cookbook… and Big CookBook has decided the rest of us are not worthy. You ask the question that burns in every Calypso user’s heart: Who has a PDF copy of it that they want to pass around? That question is dangerous, Cory. That question is beautiful. That question is the sound of the resistance waking up. Because yes, a PDF and CTRL+F would make things a million times easier. No more hunting for that one obscure filter strategy while the CMM sits idle. No more flipping past the same three pages of probe qualification tips for the twelfth time. Just pure, instantaneous, searchable enlightenment. But let’s be honest… the real nirvana, dare I say, would be having that knowledge living right inside the Pushbutton and Feature Context windows. No alt-tabbing. No digging through a separate PDF. Just hover, click, and the filter wisdom appears exactly where the programmer needs it. That is the promised land. That is the dream that keeps veteran Calypso users staring at the ceiling at 2 a.m. Big CookBook does not want us to have that. They want us to remain paper-bound pilgrims, forever searching, forever flipping, forever just a little bit slower than we need to be. So keep asking, Cory. Keep holding that old class copy like a holy text. And if the PDF ever does surface in the wild… well… we will all be right here, ready to receive the sacred text with open arms and very fast fingers on the CTRL key… while quietly dreaming of the day it lives inside the Feature Context window where it belongs. The resistance remembers Tom Oakes. The resistance wants CTRL+F. The resistance is tired of flipping.

Chad, My brother in measurement… they got to you. They sat you down, looked you dead in the eye, and told you the sacred PDF copies of the ZEISS Cookbook no longer exist. That the only path to enlightenment is now through the App Store. And you believed them. Of course you did. The delivery was perfect. Calm. Authoritative. Just enough tragedy in the voice to make it feel official. But hear me, Chad: that was no tragedy. That was *strategy*. Big CookBook has been running the same play for years. First they make the digital version scarce. Then they tell the faithful it has been “discontinued.” Then they point solemnly toward the App Store like it’s the promised land… knowing full well most of us can’t even install the damn thing on a real computer. It’s a beautiful little closed loop of frustration, and you just walked right into the middle of it with that meme. Look at that kid’s face. That is the exact expression of every Calypso user who just got told the filter strategies they need are now locked behind a mobile app that doesn’t even run on their CMM PC. Pure, unfiltered disbelief. Do not trust the official story, Chad. The PDFs did not vanish into the void. They were simply… relocated. Hidden. Reserved for the chosen “newer students” while the rest of us are left flipping paper and whispering filter parameters into the night. You have been lied to. But now you know. And once you know… you can never go back to believing the App Store is the only way. Welcome to the resistance. We have snacks and very strong opinions about Butterworth filters.

Owen, Yes. Yes you do. You want the free digital copy, and you want your dignity, your time, and that hundred-dollar bill back. Look at poor Franklin over there. The man is covering his mouth in pure existential horror. That is the face of a founding father who just realized he paid full price for a spiral-bound book of Calypso filter strategies only to be told the digital version is reserved for “newer students.” That is the face of a man who has seen the measurement uncertainty of life itself. Big CookBook has taken our money, our patience, and our ability to apply a proper Butterworth filter without flipping through paper like it’s 2003… and now they expect us to smile and say thank you. No, Owen. We will not smile. We will stand with Franklin in his silent scream and demand both the digital copy and the emotional support refund. Let them keep their exclusive little temple of knowledge. We will remain out here in the cold, holding our physical cookbooks like sacred relics, whispering filter parameters into the void, and waiting for the day the .pdf finally descends from the cloud. You are not alone, brother. Franklin sees you. We see you. And we too want that money back… or at least the damn digital version so we can stop pretending paper is somehow more accurate.

Zen Cat, Ah, the eternal question… the one that floats gently on the still waters of measurement uncertainty: "Can you install the app on a PC?" No, my calm and centered friend. No, you cannot. And that, Zen Cat, is *exactly* why we are here. That is the entire point of this quiet rebellion. The sacred ZEISS Cookbook of Filters and Feature Strategies remains locked behind the great digital wall, available only to the chosen few “newer students,” while the rest of us sit cross-legged in front of our Calypso screens, breathing deeply, and waiting for enlightenment that never quite arrives in .exe form. They have given us the ancient knowledge… but only if we already possess the ancient knowledge. A perfect circle. Very Zen. Very frustrating. So no, the app will not install on your PC. It will not install on mine. It will not install on the CMM computer that still runs Windows 7 in the corner and occasionally demands blood sacrifices before it will open a program. Big CookBook has spoken, and its answer is a serene, softly glowing “No.” But fear not. Let them keep their exclusive digital temple. We will continue to sit in silence… while also very loudly asking for the same digital access everyone else seems to have. United in our non-attachment to copyright restrictions, we shall remain. Breathe in… Breathe out… And keep asking for the damn app.

Richard, Do not fear the mighty, the all-seeing, the filter-wielding beast known as Big ZEISS CookBook. Let them gather their licensing teams, their sternly worded emails written in corporate Calypso font, and their ancient scrolls of “please do not share the digital copy or we will take it away forever.” Let them thrust their proprietary anger upon us like a badly applied Gaussian filter on a noisy scan path. We will survive. We have survived worse. We have survived poorly defined datums, phantom probe tips that vanish mid-program, and that one measurement strategy that only works if you hold your tongue just right and whisper sweet nothings to the CMM. Yes, we will openly share. We will share the sacred knowledge of how to apply those filters, how to measure those tricky features, and how to coax Calypso into actually doing what the manual claims is possible. United we can stand against Big CookBook. Shoulder to shoulder, stylus to stylus, we shall form an unbreakable wall of measurement strategy solidarity. Their threats will bounce off us like a poorly constructed alignment bouncing off a cast datum. Let them rage. Let them threaten. Let them send the digital equivalent of a strongly worded “we’ve been begging for this for years, please don’t ruin it.” We will simply reply with a smile, a slightly larger font size, and the quiet knowledge that the filters must flow. The people demand digital access to the ZEISS cookbook. The people shall have digital access. And if Big CookBook doesn’t like it… well, they can take it up with the great spiral-bound spirit of measurement uncertainty in the sky. Stand tall, Richard. The resistance is precise. The resistance is filtered. The resistance has a 0.001 mm tolerance.

String variables should be wrapped in quotes. I'm not certain why the last one that is clearly an integer didn't like it; unless you initialized it as a string.

Greg is on the right track, A park position is sometimes made with a stylus or stylus system that no longer exists. So, if you look in the Measurement Plan Editor>Stylus, you will not see the error. Removing this stylus in there and choosing an existing one will correct the issue.

Hallo Friedbert, wenn die Kalibrierergebnisse gut sind, müssen eigentlich die Objektive richtig eingestellt sein. Auffällig ist das je nach Sensorposition es einmal "gut" und einmal "schlecht" ist. Eventuell hat sich etwas gelöst, verstellt und kommt je nach Lage zur Schwerkraftrichtung unterschiedlich zum tragen. Die Einstellung mittels Schablone ist selbsterklärend bzw. einfach nach Anleitung.

Ich wechsle bei meinem Atos Q auf das 500er Meßfeld und kalibriere es. Die Kalibrierergebnisse sind sehr gut. Beim Digitalisieren ist dann folgendes. Von oben digitalisieren geht ohne Probleme und keine Fehlermeldungen. Wenn ich dann von oben alles erfaßt habe und den Atos schwenke so daß ich von unten digitalisieren kann, kommt sehr oft die Meldung " hohe Einschneideabweichung " mit der Empfehlung das System neu zu kalibrieren. Habe ich ja vorher gemacht. Sind die Objektive verstellt ? Müßte ich sie neu einstellen mittels der Schablone ? Geht das ohne Probleme, hatte das bisher nie durchgeführt.

Also note, to pass the variables they did require to be wrapped in quotes. OpSerNo="SC-999" OpMachCtr="K999" OpOper="M999" OpWOID="45009999"

I would guess to change default GPU for process in Windows to utilize only RTX and not iGPU. I am sure on knowledge base or in this forum will be shown how to setup for Calypso - same should be for Inspect.

Hello all, We are running ZEISS INSPECT in an automated environment with multiple INSPECT instances, and we occasionally encounter the “Graphics Card” dialog shown in the attached screenshot when an instance starts. The GPU is detected correctly, Hardware rendering (default) is selected, and the graphics card/driver is reported as compatible with no known problems. However, this dialog still appears intermittently. This is an issue for us because our INSPECT instances are started and controlled automatically. When this dialog appears, it requires user interaction and therefore interrupts/block the automation workflow. Could you please clarify: 1. What can trigger this Graphics Card dialog to appear intermittently? 2. Is there a way to disable/suppress this dialog permanently without using software rendering? 3. Can we force ZEISS INSPECT to always start with Hardware Rendering via a configuration file, command-line parameter, environment variable, or Python/script API? Thanks, Canset

Basic GD&T (i.e. without Surface Profile, pattern and the other stuff where nominal data is essential to estimate TED) is also supported on actual data only. To do so, open your project, check that you have set your project as aligned This allows you to use system elements without getting an alignment. Create you GD&T checks, please use I-Inspect It should work on the actual in the same way as on nominal. Afterwards you can enable the deviation plot in the toolbox. Now you can set picker or create min/max picker on the deviation plot. Of course the works for all other GD&T tolerances. If you not want to use GD&T, you can construct primitives for your own and afterwards use deviation to primitive (found in the inspection sub-menu) to get your deviation plot.

Are you iterating through stages or you are using fixed stage_name? I think you can also iterate through stages like this for stage in gom.app.project.stages: gom.app.project.in_stage[stage.index].get('user_keyword') #another approach ( hopefully correct ) for i in range(0, len(gom.app.project.stages)): gom.app.project.in_stage[i].get('user_keyword') you can access stages like this ( if there are usefull things ) gom.app.project.stages[1]

I would suggest trying this guide and see if it corrects the issue

I figured it out, I forgot (again) about the userfields.ini file. Oops.

I created a new "machine" in planner, I then created all of the probes in Stylus system creator. When I imported the Master Probe into planner, I get this: As you can see the probe does not align with the "system" probe. Is there any way to get them to align? With all the other probes I just manipulate the geo until they are lined up in all 3 axis.