All Activity

As of patch 8.0.1204 the travel issue with torus has been documented fixed.

Do you have auto fetch data on?

Here is the link on how to export using measurement tables as Richard mentioned above. The export option through PiWeb reporting plus is a bit limited at customization. https://portal.zeiss.com/knowledge-base?id=513250

Is this toggled on for the characteristics by chance?

This method works without reporting plus. You simply modify the report template to include an export option and the exported file looks a little cleaner too with this method. https://portal.zeiss.com/knowledge-base?id=513250

There are some options for outputting to CSV if you have PiWeb reporting plus. Here is a link on how to: https://portal.zeiss.com/knowledge-base?id=1350161

I tested this myself today. Looks like it is working on my end. Hope everyone else has the same success with 8.0.1204

That or there's no iteration of the calculated alignment. Either way, I don't believe valueA on a secondary alignment ever changes with loops.

Hi, Add a text with the following system expression: ${Qdb.Measurement(4, 0)} - ${Qdb.Measurement(4, -1)} to the drawing area. Switch to the "Properties" tab. Change the "Format" property to "Date formatting". In the "Date format" property, select your desired format.

Hi, add a checkbox to the drawing area. In the properties of the checkbox, define the corresponding system variable for the "Variable" property. Set the "Checked value" property to 1 and the "Unchecked value" property to 0.

Ich würde hier auch empfehlen, die zu schneidende Fläche als Patchverband -> MP Fittingelement zu konstruieren. Wenn im Netz irgendwo ein kleines Loch ist oder eine Fläche zu viel, passt der 5. Schnittpunkt schon nicht mehr.

Here's a form you all can fill out if you're interested in taking CALYPSO Expert. TRAINING CLASS SIGNUP: TRAINING SIGNUP ASSISTANCE LINK

Hallo, ich möchte eine Fläche gegen eine andere ersetzen. Strategie, Prüfelement usw. alles bei der ursprungsfläche hinterlegt. Dies soll auf die Neue Fläche übertragen werden. Gibt es da eine Möglichkeit? Mfg

Doesn't the differenceSystem() essentially check the difference of the alignment to the main alignment? I felt like when I tried to use it years ago it always showed large values, so if it was a completely new origin, you will never achieve what you want/need.

So, right click to access the loop option of the secondary and use differenceSystem in the condition? Simple. Great to know thanks to Luca for the ask and thanks to Keith for the answer.

"differenceSystem()" for secondary

Hello Mike, Thank you for sharing the information.🙏

Hi, I would like to know how it is possible to implement a loop for a second alignment (not the base alignment). For the base alignment, we use the condition baseSystem().valueA < 0.005. How can something similar be implemented for this second alignment?

Hello, please have a look at this link and find the solution for your software version: Software Information Hub

Last week, after a Windows update, GOM Professional crashes every time I try to open it. can't do what the messages says because it doesn't open. What should I try?

I got into this also ( just 1 of 2 ) - to correct that i had to specify starting point ( origin ) - originaly there was "automatical" As i see it i've used another version of intersection ( on 2025 version ) - on your screenshots this option is not there. Edit: As i thought - i was using "Intersetion curve/surface" - this icon() By this you can make intersection even on circles

Hallo Martin, hatte das Problem auch schon. Habe glaub mit Selektionen/Teilbereichen gearbeitet, um den selben Schnittpunktcounter zu bekommen.

Hallo zusammen, will man einen Schnittpunkt einer Linie mit dem CAD erzeugen, so muss man die entsprechende Schnittpunkt-Nr. angeben. Hier im Beispiel ist das der Punkt Nr. 7. Macht man nun referenzierte Konstruktion will die SW den entsprechenden IST-Schnittpunkt auch an Nr. 7 erzeugen. DAS CAD hat allerdings Innenflächen, die im IST nicht gemessen sind. Somit ist der richtige IST-Schnittpunkt nicht die Nr. 7 sondern wie in meinem Beispiel die Nr. 5 Meiner Meinung nach könnte das Problem behoben werden, wenn die Software die Schnittpunkte vom Startpunkt der Linie aus zählen würde. Im Beispiel wäre das dann jeweils der Punkt Nr. 1. Hab ich etwas übersehen, dass das bereits geht oder könnte man das implementieren? Danke und viele Grüße Martin Krüger

Hi, perhaps due my ignorance i can not set correct exposure times for each scan. I thought project template will have stored those values for each individual scan serie. So to help my colleagues i want to create a wizard which will have needed part alignment on a table and current tilt of a sensor according to the floor. For now i am able to obtain tilt information only from measured scan, which can be also used in picture in dialog. By recording i know how to setup exposure times and run individual / rotary table scans. Is there a way to obtain current live image with ability to see actual tilt and changes in exposure times? My intent is do some sort of kios mode, where in one project i can scan parts from different materials ( thats for exposure times ), ability to manually select points to remove scanned points under a plane and control tilt of a sensors to keep correct view into problematic parts. Thanks for any hints.

Hi all My CMM has a problem... Does anybody have an idea as to what causes my machine to cut off the drive motor when trying change styli configuration. It cuts the motor just as it is about to place the styli in the rack. I have attached the error message. Any idea would be greatly appreciated