All Activity

Hi Christian, It is probably in this menu:

Hello everyone, could someone please explain the difference between an extracted surface and an associated element in an MMR condition? I’m trying to apply an MMR condition to a cylindrical hole, but I’m not sure which option I should choose. It would also be great if you could show how you create it yourselves. Thank you very much for any opinions and help.

Hallo Sven Unter folgende Link ist dieses problem gelöst worden. Musst einen Eintrag im qdasconv.con Datei machen. Gruss

Hello, I received a measurement plan from another manufacturing site, and when running the plan, I am met with the following error message at the end of the run. The CNC is disabled and the PIWeb report will not print. Where do I access PostSettings in Calypso2025 so I can change this file path? There is no X Drive mapped to this PC.

Hi Richard, There is a PMI eLearning available. Learning Content: Identify basic requirements needed to create a PMI measurement plan Create measurement plans using PMI in ZEISS CALYPSO. Apply dimensional, form and location tolerances on a PMI program LINK

We may be getting into using PMI (Model Based Definition). Is anyone using this? Is there a STEP AP242 model available for training? Pros Cons Does Zeiss offer training?

"Note 17 displays the .015 allowance as a stock added condition." 42

Note 17 displays the .015 allowance as a stock added condition.

Never had something like this before. I would measure the depth of surface texture (value below 0,015) and hope that it is quite uniform and put it on the tolerance (additive). Now do you put it on the tolerance out or in the material or 50/50? This is pretty much impossible by the info given alone. One could decide depending on how the texture is achieved. Is something added to achieve the texture or is something removed to achieve the texture? Thinking about the wording ... I would read "in addition" as additive material wise (non native speaker).

Hi, I don't know about QDAS, but I installed this patch today and I see error during installation: Zeiss BfexService failed. I clicked continue anyway and will see if anything will go wrong.

I still don't understand your measurement. If it's defined radius then don't bother with a curve. If you need to set datum for that by those 10 points, then do that ( example: by besfitting those points ).

I have a print where non-toleranced features fall under Note 7. Note 7 is a profile of Unequal Distribution .040/.010 Then there is Note 17, which allows for a surface condition. See attached image. How do I implement Note 17 in the Profile requirement? Edit: I am unable to find a single instance where Flag Note 17 is applied to a feature. All Notes are "Unless Otherwise Specified". Now I wonder if Note 17 is a general note and not applicable on this particular blueprint.

This feature must meet its positional tolerance relative to A|B-C|D to 0.020, while having a form of less than 0.005. Without a datum to reference, you can only consider form as you have nothing to "measure from" except yourself. Position, not profile. the below is correct.

Have you checked these settings? See image.

Wait till you see what the little arrow on the right side of the screen does! 🙂

Hallo Zusammen, ich hatte gestern das Patch 8.0.1205 installiert und seit dem keine QDAS-Ausgabe sprich DFQ-Datei mehr erhalten. Ich habe dies bezüglich auch ein Ticket bei Zeiss am laufen. Hat noch jemand von euch Probleme dies bezüglich mit dem Patch?

Thought so, remnants of an old measurement with a switching sensor on a cmm 🙂 If the results for postions and the curve you build are the same, then use it the way you have it set up and do a measurement comparision with 10 parts (Evaluating the max diff between both system) Best would be to track both the curve results and the position rssults just in case.

I have a specification and i need to use those points as i have to compare the results with same method, same points on CMM. I measured also position for each point and i have the same result with line profile

I think you can easily skip those points and create section, which can be evaluated as profile directly

Hi Florin, i am not sure if it even makes sense to create a curve with so few points and evaluate it, because most of the what you are going to evaluate will be "not really exisiting". You could instead evaluate the position of each point and the result would be the worst deviation.

I want to measure the whole curve , line profile for the whole curve made from these 11 points

What you want to achieve? Measured deviation on those points or whole curve?

Hi, Can you please help me with an idea of how to measure a profile on a radius form certain points? So i have 11 points that are already defined on the radius and i want to construct a curve from this points and measure line profile. It is ok to use construct curve or smoothed spline curve? Thanks Ciprian

Hallo, das CAD kann wie von @René beschrieben über die Zwischenablage importiert werden. Beim Verschieben -> Ersetzen lässt sich auf diesem Wege das Ziel-Koordinatensystem auswählen. Im Ausrichtungsmenü Operationen -> Ausrichtung gibt es die Kategorie 'Einzelelement-Transformation'. Damit lässt sich das CAD vor dem Ersetzen transformieren. Nach dem Import ist diese Funktion häufig sehr nützlich: ZEISS Quality Tech Guide Nanno