All Activity

This? ->

I see no problem. If it's for base alignment and you can always hit your datums while on fixture, then you don't need anything else. Other question is how much can real part differ against model in close places, like holes.

Hallo zusammen, ich suche aktuell nach einer guten und eindeutigen Lösung, um die Querbohrungen verdrehgesichert zum stirnseitigen Bohrbild zu definieren bzw. zu bemaßen. Eine Skizze zur Verdeutlichung habe ich angehängt. Vielen Dank schon mal vorab für eure Hilfe 👍

Thanks for the UPDATE

When adjusting the stylus angle visually, use the longest possible stylus or extension. Adjusting with a stylus that is twice as long will halve the deviation.

I can't speak for XXT geometry requalification, but for passive, and also for tensor and 6 points on an VAST/XT. All of these run fine automatically and update the RS position. We use a setup like this for many years now. I guess any type of (re)calibrating the master probe is synonymous to updating the sphere location.

Ooops! It seems my mind somehow added an "un-" to the word "coded".

Hallo, sucht aktuell noch jemand nach einer Lösung zum automatischen Stempeln von technischen Zeichnungen? Ich suche Beta-Tester für meine Software. Das Programm stempelt Zeichnungen automatisch und erstellt daraus direkt einen Calypso-Prüfplan inklusive aller gestempelten Prüfmerkmale. Ziel ist eine deutliche Zeitersparnis bei der Prüfplanerstellung und Merkmalskennzeichnung. https://drawingstamppro.com/beta.html

I just tested Passive Qualification, and the Reference Sphere's position does update when done manually and automatically. I tested this on a 543 with the 4mm pallet and removed and installed the reference sphere between runs.

The "Free" version has 'automatic recalculation' turned on by default. if your elements are visible and you switch alignments, they should recalculate automatically, if not they may have a broken dependency (?) - you can check the reason in the properties tab of the element. If its the latter, you can always re-create the check/element (you can not edit w free version). but that being said its extremely powerful free software, I only wish they'd get rid of the log in / license requirement. (like the good ol' GOM Inspect days). Good luck, post more details if your struggling with something in particular. In the future, this forum may be more appropriate & provide a quicker response: https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/forum/20-general/

I'd be interested in this as well. It's been my experience that the only time the RS information gets updated is when a manual qualification happens. I can do any of the other tips I have, but when it comes to the RS, only a manual calibration works. Although I can fixture a RS to be in the same place, it's never in the exact same place. It's only close. When checking really tight tolerance stuff, only being close can make the difference between pass and fail. That's why I insist on my operators doing only manual qualifications when it comes to the RS. If there's a better way to do it, I'm all ears.

If he says they are using them, but they are not magnetic, then it should be ok. Also here is diameter 3 coded from 113 to 217 https://shop.metrology.zeiss.com/INTERSHOP/web/WFS/IMT-US-Site/en_US/-/USD/ViewProduct-Start?SKU=604001-2017-000&CategoryName=424110&CatalogID=400000&ExtendedNavigation=true

Coded reference markers are typically only used for photogrammetry. If you buy those uncoded 3mm reference markers, while you can make them work on the T-Scan Hawk, they are not designed to natively work on the Hawk, and it will struggle to see them at times.

I usually use 15upr, Gauss, Low-pass. I would use more points to help the calculation.

Thank you.

In this way there is this https://shop.metrology.zeiss.com/INTERSHOP/web/WFS/IMT-US-Site/en_US/-/USD/ViewProduct-Start?SKU=000250-0004-747

Lucas, you can move the star probe parallel to the component and then check the gap to see whether it is parallel.

Hi Richard, Maybe this helps ?😎 SURFCOM_TOUCH_50_Setup_Instructions_EN.pdf

Does Zeiss have a server in Kentucky where this type of activity could ariginate?

How about these: https://shop.metrology.zeiss.de/INTERSHOP/web/WFS/IMT-DE-Site/en_DE/-/EUR/ViewProduct-Start?SKU=604001-4892-000

I have looked at all of our CMM's and this activity is on them all, it looks like a rolling time frame with different IPs (Similar to the original test posted) per CMM.

I use an indicator running it along the shaft of the Stylus and align the stylus to one of the axes (X or Y) within .001" per 1 inch of stroke. If you are using two or more styli in two or more axes, just indicate one of them. Otherwise, you will be chasing them all day.

Looking for information on how to setup this unit for this requirement (See image: Finish Requirement.png) The second image is what is suggested that can be set on this unit? (See image: SurfCom Specifications.png) I have little knowledge of how to set up this unit; any help is appreciated.

All of the results are stored on the network at creation less some general information for Excel file creation which is local. I will look into making the Drive a variable in PCM so I can swap it on the run in the future.

Hi Richard, it could be another program trying to connect via the intranet network, normally CALYPSO should only show the local host (127.0.0.1) if its an internal application call, for example when you switch to GEAR Pro. As @David Gafner mentioned, you should involve your IT department to take a closer look, even tho i dont think its an attack, but another software is trying to connect or at least scans the CALYPSO Ports. A quick check would be to disconnect the LAN cable from the Intranet (if you programs are stored local), then this message should not appear anymore. Best Regards Marcel