All Activity

What settings you have to show deviations and colors? Select profile and on right panel open Properties -> Display - show color deviation representation. Now select from center of tolerance. It should show correct deviation numbers as profile sees it.

When I inspect the surface profile in the first image, the obtained profile does not match the corresponding colour plot. Similarly, in the second image, the line profile does not match the trim line comparison. Why does this happen?

I plan to have this in my Calypso program editor 🙂

You can create nominal or fitting plane from either laso selection on CAD/mesh or nominal plane on CAD using patch selector ( usually on bottom toolbar ) Left click adds to selection, Ctrl+left click removes from selection

Moin zusammen, gibt es eine Möglichkeit von einer Fläche, diese zu einer Ebene zu Konstruieren.

Hi, I would like to ask if anyone know how to export volume reconstruction files can be in tiff or rec. from ZEISS INSPECT X RAY, so i can open the scanning results from Bosello Max to other reconstruction software such as 3D slicer or AVIZO, as i will conduct further analysis regarding pore networking which can not be done in Zeiss Inpect X Ray. Best regard

Tricky, but absolutely working. Thanks! 🙂

Mahlzeit Zusammen, mich hat es immer gestört, dass die Qualifizierung/Kalibrierung der Taster sehr lange läuft. Wer kennt es nicht man macht mal schnell eine Stellung für irgendwas die man nie mehr braucht. Ich habe ein Excel Makro erstellt das Automatisch das Prüfplanverzeichnis durchsucht und alle Taster und deren Stellung auflistet die tatsächlich in gebrauch sind. Es filtert alles doppelte raus damit eine saubere Liste mit Taster und Stellung ergibt. Falls Interesse besteht gerne melden.

Hi, regarding creating a SP (not a line profile) where the actual data are only a point cloud. One word in advance: you will still need a mesh based CAD. Surface Profile from Point-Cloud to Point-Cloud makes no sense. The following steps should be working. 1) Create your Surface Points on Actual Data 2) Create a Point Cloud based on these surface Points (Construct -> Point Cloud -> Discrete Point Cloud From Selection). Hint: To select single points please select them in the explorer, press the right mouse button and choose Select All Points From Element) 3) Create an Patch Compound on your CAD. 4) Choose measuring principle Fitting element (switch your target inside the measuring principle dialog to the actual Point Cloud created in step 2) 5) Create your SP as usual. Yes, it is complicated but this is not a standard workflow. To my understanding if you have mesh data it should always be the way to go to use all points. Using more points you will get more information and reliable results.

You don't want to use actual section, you want to use reference construction. Actual section isn't parametric, but reference construction will be. The programmer I took over for didn't really know what they were doing and used actual for everything. I eventually just rewrote all the programs. Once you switch it to reference it will also lose its alignment and that caused me problems with parts with threads that could be rotating with a local alignment.

HI Piotr I have been trying as much as I could and it always has to stop between parts to generate a PiWeb, even if it is not printed, it must save the measures. If I disable all PiWeb it doesn´t save the measures. But I found a way of obtaining a max of 1000 measures per report. It is not very elegant, but is the max you can do, and you don´t necessarily need PiWebPlus to do it. You only need to edit the table Protocol. There are only a few steps, and it is very easy. - First, you must modify the page dimensions. File/Page set up... and increase the width to the max you need. It is not going to be an elegant report, but you can have all the measures on one page... - Then you maximize the size of the protocol area to the new width of the page. - When the report appears, it is going to have only 12 measures. Then you click on "Navigation/Show measurement selection" You open the measurements window and there you can select as many as 1000 measures to print in the report. As I said before it won´t be elegant but everything will be in the same report. I hope you find it useful.

You make a good point. In fact, we'll be escalating this to the development team as a possible new feature in upcoming versions.

try curve polyline

Hy! At the moment it is on a section but I would like to do it on a surface also but with given points. How is it possible in the software?

Hi, you can directly create a section and check it. Do you need the specific points? Something similar was discussed here:

Hy! How can I create a surface profile inspection from surface points? A created a section and surface points but can not check them for profile. BR, Máté

Why is it that despite a lot of convenient functions being added to Calypso, we still have to edit a config file in 90s style from time to time, only to achieve such a simple goal? In the 21st century a "Clear List" button really shouldn't be too much to ask for. 🙄

It depends on a function, but 1 option if ISO is:

Hello Tim, That is right. So you are saying that this is intended behavior with the measurement principle "actual section"? I was under the impression that a parametric software would also change the calculation when creating the actual section, when underlying parameters are changed. I will have look into that, thank you.

Isn’t this already available via the variable strategy editor? They have the cookbook strategies built-in already. I also created a simplified version that just looks at size, length, etc. and chooses the appropriate point density and such. I have not yet found a way to mass update filters and outliers like this, but I’m hoping there is a way.

I want to note that this has not been the case in my experience. The numbers change depending on machine units setting.

Wow thanks. Will try it out.

https://portal.zeiss.com/knowledge-base?id=513250

Possible to output tableprotocol to excel?

If anyone comes across this post in the future and is looking for information on how to use simultaneous requirements, more information can be found in this knowledge base article here: https://portal.zeiss.com/knowledge-base?id=3450000