All Activity

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30011741/3d-vector-defined-by-2-angles This should be enough for understanding

ATOS Q 12m 170 should be sufficient, try adding more spray / additional measurements from various angles..etc. Improving data quality will go along way. You might want to try a different approach for inspection, sounds like you're trying to determine how much the form of that honeycomb surface deviates from a cylinder? Constructing an actual cylinder on a partial arc with that data will most definitely lead to poor results, touch point edges are going to be inconsistent too(unless you improve data quality significantly). I'd recommend aligning the part to CAD, creating a nominal cylinder from cad, roughly selecting the top of the honeycomb surface on the actual scan, then doing & Inspection-> deviation to geometry(select the 'nominal' cylinder). That should project all the points you selected perpendicular to the cylinders surface. you can then apply deviation labels at various nominal points. Hope it helps.

I am acccessing ATOS5 via it's IP - should be in the configuration.

Hi All, Need help troubleshooting this. Has anyone ever have an issue with Zeiss Hardware service that can't get to the Triple Scan on a Domain PC? I can get to 127.0.0.1:39025 but can't get to :39026. No Computers Policy apply. Firewall is off. no Endpoint install. On a Vanilla Win10, I can do all that without any issue. 1. Install Zeiss Quality Suite, 2. Install Zeiss Inspect hardware service, and 3. install Zeiss Inspect. Thank you.

Is there a formula to calculate the xyz vectors in the stylus definition? I have a prove at A90 B105, and I have not been able to find the correct vectors, As you can see the probes do not line up. Thanks for any help!🙂

Hallo ZueSt, das ist richtig, allerdings gibt es mehrere Gründe für den Fehler "Failed to log in". Die aktuellen Login-Probleme existieren seit letzter Woche und sind durch externe Einflüsse bedingt, s. aktueller Post im verlinkten Thread.

--- German version --- Durch externe Einflüsse auf unsere Infrastruktur kommt es derzeit vorübergehend zu Einschränkungen beim Log-In in die ZEISS Quality Suite. Unsere Experten arbeiten bereits an einer Lösung und informieren zeitnah. --- English version --- Due to external influences on our infrastructure, there are currently temporary restrictions on logging into the ZEISS Quality Suite. Our experts are already working on a solution and will provide you with information in a timely manner.

I know Robert Disser. 🙂 He told me about the "hidden feature" of qdas.bat, which allows to write a second QDAS file based on a second config file. Unfortunately it doesn't help in my case (because I can't invoke it seperately). I may contact him if I can't find a solution, but somehow I doubt there's yet another hidden feature like this.

Der erste Beitrag war am 21. Februar ??

You could search inside "inspset" and "inspection" files for links to a sab or sat file.

Thank you!

Hello, this is a known problem which is currently being troubleshooted, see this post in another thread:

Hello, we are still trying to solve this problem with high priority. The root cause is not any Windows update. Thank you for your patience in the meantime. As mentioned in https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/25913-failed-to-log-in-error-when-clicking-on-log-in-in-zeiss-quality-suite/?do=findComment&comment=149194, the ZEISS Portal is an alternative for some tasks, especially for downloading software.

Hello, I've also the same problem with the login of the current Quality Suite 7.1.2847.0. Best regards Michael

Hello, we have the same problems - ZEISS Quality Suite login and installs not working. Nobody is fixing it.

I don't think that will work. We had a specialist training course for QDAS from Zeiss. It was conducted by Robert Disser, an absolute top expert in PiWeb and QDAS; he might be able to help you.

Maybe I need to describe in more detail what I intend to do. Up until now I have two destinations Calypso results are fed to: One is a QS-Stat system with automatic upload service to a QDAS database (this is for our serial production), the other one is a CAQ system where we do our first sample inspections. While the CAQ needs all the characteristics, the QDAS system only takes a narrowed down selection of results. Today the data for the CAQ system is read from the compact protocol and the protocols are written to individual paths. The QDAS data on the other hand is written the usual way (with settings in QDASCONV.CON) to DFD/DFX files, which are then transferred to the database by the QDAS upload service and deleted afterwards. Now, in the near future our CAQ system will change and the new system can no longer read results from the compact protocol, but needs a QDAS file. So now I'm looking for a way to generate a seperate QDAS file in a different location with ALL charcteristics, and WITHOUT disturbing the normal data transfer to the QDAS system in any way. I can not just grab the files written by the normal QDAS output: They do not contain all the data needed and are continuously fetched and then deleted by the upload service. Meddling with this workflow would severely disturb our production process.

What about workpiece.vff at the bottom of the list? VFF is a proprietary CAD format that is also used for SSC stylus or CMM models. For personal reasons I find it very interesting that Calypso seems to be able to write that format now. ☺️ May I ask which Calypso version you have?

Don, you are pretty close to the goal you want to meet 😉 Just replace "....gear [Profile / Lead / Index (Std)]" => "....gear [Lead Only]". Than it should work as you expect.

Chad, regarding the described phenomenom and the important hint "all teeth measurement" this could be a timing problem? More teeth, more evaluation time, more printing time, ... You could try to deactivate the mm background grid on the report pages for the PDF creation. Just deactivate the yellow marked checkbox. With doing this the file size will automatically decrease dramatically even if you have an all teeth measurement.

@Edgars Putelis thank you for reminding me, that I already answered this topic in the mentioned post 🙂.

Maybe this would help!

Hallo zusammen, dem kann ich mich nur anschließen. Bei uns das gleiche Problem! Viele Grüße

Hello, has anyone found a solution yet?

Hello, We are experiencing the same issue. After attempting to update ZEISS Inspect Optical 3D Version 2026.3.1.9, the software became unusable. We hope it will be resolved soon so that we can continue using it. Thank you in advance