All Activity

This will be by evaluation of datum C/ C' By norms is datum in this case evaluated as tangential element ( circumscribed ). Circularity will tell you more and is the reason why it differs.

Hallo zusammen, mir ist bei der Messung eines Teils ein Problem aufgefallen. An einem Bolzen messe ich zwei Kreise die 1,4mm voneinander entfernt sind. Beim Auswerten der Konzentrizität ist mir aufgefallen, dass die Werte deutlich voneinander abweichen. Bei beiden Messungen habe ich jeweils den anderen Kreis als Bezug verwendet. Ich frage mich nun ob das sein kann und wenn ja warum das so ist. Ich freue mich auf Eure Kommentare

Hello, is there a tutorial that explains how to add or modify report style ?

Hallo, Wir mussten wegen eines anderen Fehlers das Patch für 8.0.1203 installieren. Seit dem scheint der Qdas Export nicht mehr zu funktionieren. Die DFQ wird nicht erzeugt, die Qdas-Log zeigt nur ein "qdas: starting conversion at....." So wie es aussieht scheint die qdasconv.exe kaputt zu sein. Wenn ich die durch eine ältere Version ersetze geht der Export wie gehabt. Ist jemanden das auch schon aufgefallen? Gruß, Matthias

That's what I was looking for. Thank you.

Are you evaluating the slots as individual symmetry planes or one combined symmetry plane?

Thank you, as this is what I was searching for. I will see if this helps in our reports. Thanks again!

That did it!! Thank you Richard for all your help, it's greatly appreciated.

Decided to give it another try after the latest patch, and yea, still avoiding 8.0. I tried an uninstall and reinstall with latest SP and patch, and I think it is actually worse than it was before.

Hmm. I've never really seen it do that just because the stylus is that flexible. You could try turning it to Sensitive and Probing Dynamics to 10% to see if that helps.

In feature strategy.

Same probe qualified on a different Duramax, same result.

I turned the speed knob down to about a quarter, and it seemed to get a bit further, but ultimately gave me the same error again.

Here's a tidbit regarding mini-plans. If you select a group to be in a mini-plan, you can drag other characteristics into the group and they become part of the mini-plan.

If you turn the "speed-knob" down, will it run all the way through?

Down probe only, -Z

Is this a 3x125mm star probe or is the stylus facing the -Z?

As for getting the outer tangent. I did a quick test, and here would be my first attempt. Measure the OD, and set that as the X,Y Origin. Create a Theoretical Circle that lives at X=0;Y=0;Z=(whatever height you choose to measure the end arc at);Diam=0 Measure the end arc. Construction - Tangent: Theoretical Circle and end arc Circle. Use either a Theoretical Plane/3d Line for the Centerline Measure the Angle between the two.

I created a new probe and during qualification, I keep getting a "33 Collision: Possible loss of commands" part way through the qualification. It makes a few passes around the qualification sphere, but then for some reason errors out after a few passes. Anyone have an idea why this would be happening? I've checked other probes and they qualify perfectly without any issues. This is a 3x125mm Silicon Nitride probe if that makes a difference.

You can use the slot as your Planar Rotation. You can also use Special option to rotate the -15°, so that your nominals match what is shown here.

Hi Viktor, the "unlock" will come with 2026 Service Pack 2 (it is a bug and will be fixed with this version 🙂)

Once sensor is seeing more than 3 known ref points, then it should rotate model view accordingly.

Anmerkung: Man sollte zwischen der Umschaltung von unabhängig auf abhängig keine Neuberechnung machen. Das bescherte mir einen reproduzierbaren Software-Crash.

We've switched from GOM Inspect 2022 to Zeiss Inspect 2026. There is a function called Rotate 3D View To Sensor and it's not working. Is there any tip or trick to "unlock" this view?

currently trying to figure out how to add a programmable stop. help?