All Activity

Ist es möglich, eine Messreihe, die bereits über Ref.-Punkte oder Flächen in eine andere transformiert wurde, wieder zu "enttransformieren"?

Hi Arda, This feature might also help: https://techguide.zeiss.com/en/zeiss-inspect-2026/article/cmd_inspection_create_form_change_range.html

Ach so, das dient quasi als alternative Beschäftigungstherapie. Die gemeldeten Fehler werden dann auf niedrige (= keine) Priorität eingestuft. So hat der Anwender das beruhigende Gefühl man hört ihm zu und es passiert was. Dann haben auch die Entwickler mehr Zeit, sich auf das Einbauen neuer Bu...ääh Features zu konzentrieren. Genial.

Damit der Anwender mehr Zeit dazu hat, noch vorhandene Fehler in der Software an den Support zu melden und er nicht zu viel Zeit damit "verdaddelt", die Oberfläche ergonomisch und nach seinen Vorstellungen einzustellen... :-)

Was the inspection plan opened and saved using a newer version of Calypso? If so, the older version will no longer be able to open it. In the inspection plan's directory, you will find a version file; this can be opened with a text editor to change the version.

Hello Marco, i dont really know the T-Hawk, but i highly doubt that it can handle a 0,01 Profile Tolerance with a demanding part. Better get in touch with your Zeiss regional contact. They can give you all the info you need and or even test the application beforehand.

Have you checked the permissions on each of the folder(s) and file(s)?

I can't open the .jpg

Please see the picture, scanned surface to find the flatness. Is there any way to find the size of defected area (zone). Thank you

We are looking for a system that can inspect surface profile of honeycomb surfaces. Currently looking into a T Scan Hawk 2 operating the Zeiss Inspect software. The challenge we currently have is 2 fold. 1 our MBD is a solid surface and does not show the honeycomb so touch probe automated scanning is difficult from piece to piece. The second challenge is scanning is bringing in too much data that doesnt apply to the surface profile. Can Zeiss inspect apply appropriate filters to remove the 'hairs' that can be a result of the machining process? Can the scan depth be adjust to just capture the specified profile surface (think of a chicken wire)? T Scan Hawk 2 is being looked at for its size capabilities over conventional bridge CMMs.

This scenario doesnt happen often here, maybe once a year. Once i have IT load the backup copy it has always resolved itself. I dont know how they get corrupt but it happens.

It could possibly be the thing that is preventing you from loading it. I'd make a copy of the program on the desktop or something, then delete the temp file. If it doesn't work, you still have the original file to troubleshoot.

Richard, Thanks for the response. I am at a loss as this issue has not come up before. I think I have attached pictures my files. One is REV 10 version of the program, which loads fine, the other is the REV 11 version that won't load. I did notice that on the REV 11 file, there is a folder titled "TEMP" and that is the one that won't load. In the TEMP folder is a sub-folder titled "GEOACTUALS". I'm not sure if that is the issue or not. We store our programs on our network that is backed up every day. I might get with our IT department and see if they can load the program from a couple days ago. Loads Properly.pdf Measurement Plan Could Not Be Loaded.pdf

Check the contents of the offending folder compared to a folder where the program does load. Compare file names and see if some files are missing. Do you not have back ups? As a note, all of my files reside on a server, these are copied to the local drive to run. This way you should never lose the original program integrity.

We are trying to load a proven measurement plan, and we get the message "Measurement Plan Could Not Be Loaded." This is the first time that I have gotten this message, and I am confused by it. I have a couple other programs for this part that load just fine. Does anyone know how to fix this, other than rewriting the program? It's a rather complicated program to re-write, but if that's what we have to do, we will. All help is appreciated.

I used the one under special geometry. I understand I could also use theoretical circles.

Hello Arda, are you interested in the deviation of the normals of the actual surface to the nominal surface? This function might help in this case: Create Draft Angle Map If you are interested in the defects, you can create a surface defect map and then create surface defects: 1. Create Surface Defect Map 2. Create Surface Defect Element

try to convert it in .sat with an other application before open it with calypso.

I have tried several different .dxf files, and I cannot get any of them to open in Calypso. I followed the steps of importing the cad file, but I get an error message every time (see below). Any help would be great.

Does Exchange row template need to be checked as well? side note, whenever I add cad presentations, my cad model becomes glitchy and rotating/moving the view isn't smooth.

Yes, that is what i have been doing for so long is going into View and Multiple report and bring it back up. My bad, i was thinking you were talking about reloading the whole PiWeb report, like the Standard Protocol one that i am using currently. This is why the frustration has set in having to go in and reload the Multiple Report again.

I have been doing this for nearly two decades. I create the Base Alignment from the tooling balls. Add a Prompt to load part after that completes. The remainder of the program runs from a separate alignment, not the Base Alignment. Which works well for me because I never use the Base Alignment for any reportable requirements. All Features/Characteristics are tied at minimum to the separate alignment (I call it the CNC Alignment).

Hello, I have mesh/CAD comparison of a certain part. In this deviation analysis I can clearly see the deviating areas but what I am trying to do is to mark deviation where we have a sharp angle deviation from the surface. Does anyone know if this is possible? You can see in the image where we have this deviation but I don't know if this is sharp enough or not. Any tool that would give me that measure?

If you are able to create CAD Presentations, have you turned on the "Display plots in report"? Resources Character settings Editor Display plots in report Then you select any characteristic that has a CAD Presentation.

Ich verstehe sowieso ganz allgemein betrachtet nicht die Motivation hinter den modernen Farbschemata in aller möglichen Software. Das muss so ein albernes Lifestyle-Dings sein, dem man Lesbarkeit, Ergomnomie und wasweissich alles opfert, nur um "cool" und "futuristisch" auszusehen. Da würde ich noch lieber mit dem Mickymaus-Design der 90er-Jahre arbeiten. Was ich aber noch schlimmer finde als so ein Design zum Standard zu machen, ist die konsequente Beschneidung der Fähigkeit des Anwenders, dieses zu verändern. Früher waren Farbeinsteller allgemeiner Standard und das war sehr gut so. Heute bekommt man nur noch die feste Auswahl zwischen, Pest, Ruhr und Cholera. Warum?