All Activity

Will you not damage the RDS if you just pull it, I am in the same boat. I am not getting that click release sound and I am hesitant to just pull it off.

I work at a company with 200 + employees. Myself and one other in my group know how to turn a CMM off or on. Most can successfully spell CMM most of the time, but that's about it. Nobody knows what I do. I like it this way. Leave me alone and trust me. I am also Quality. In my opinion, and in my company, I'm sure this is the only correct placement.

Store the gear file in the measurement plan folder. In Calypso, in the gear definition template, right click on the gear file and select "formula" If you want to store it elsewhere you'll need to find out how to call that specific folder. Input this formula: getActualInspectionDir()+"\<name of gear file>.gear [Default]" [Default] is used to specify a GearPro miniplan if you have one. This is the standard wording. If you have miniplans you can replace the text with your individual one. This syntax opens the gear file in the measurement folder, even if you move that folder elsewhere.

You just solved the problem I'm having right now. Thanks so much.

scratching my head a bit on how touching off an angled surface properly sets an accurate 'Z' height for plate to slide in and out accurately... oh well.

The issue is mostly likely Calypso's native delimiter being a space. I have a PCM workaround, but another simpler way is just opening the text file in notepad, do a find and replace. In the "find" field, just tap the spacebar to add a space. In the replace field, place a single comma. Select replace all and save it. You may need to save it as a .csv, or something else. I'm not familiar with AutoCAD.

nope, for Dk = 5, 200 mN should be fine.

should I remove the evaluation then? How do I mask the points on the curve?

In that case you should measure them as individual curves, model that as a small radii or use more segments. Problem is scanning around sharp corners and evaluation also - similar with tolerance band. You can also mask some of problematic points around corner.

Two line distance will report the closest distance - i am not sure if this is what author wants.

Hallo Florian, das was @Sven Radtke geschrieben hat kann ich an dieser Stelle so unterschreiben, was genau übertragen werden soll müsst ihr definieren und dabei kann Robert Disser natürlich von A-Z unterstützen. Bzgl. des Ausgabeformats UTF8-BOM ist dies tatsächlich ein Thema, aktueller Stand ist allerdings das mit dem Patch 8.0.0805 wieder auf das Format UTF8 (ohne BOM) gewechselt wurde, damit funktioniert es mit der CAQ Software von Böhme und Weihs und anderen CAQ Systemen problemlos. Jedoch führt dieses Format aktuell zu Problemen mit älteren QDAS Versionen, ich habe dies heute als BUG and die Entwicklung weiter gegeben und man arbeitet an einer Lösung. Gruß Marcel

OK, got another one doing the same. Running a profile around a boss, the corners are modeled sharp, are probed as sharp, but shows chamfers on plot, and is out of tolerance. Any help would be appreciated.

Hallo Dirk, habe zwar keinen Rundtisch aber wenn KMG passt muss das ja fast von deiner Ausrichtung kommen. Kannst Du einen Lehrring mal so vermessen?.

Thanks all who replied. The values seemed quite low considering the arrangement so I was inclined to believe there may be an issue with the head as none of our other systems even meet the 30 mark. Would be great if someone were able to replicate this build and obtain rigidity values on their machine to compare results. @Chris Rotolo Thanks Chris, I am using the Reach CFX extensions in this setup at all three joints. All components are new as well, including the adapter plate. I used the standard probing force/speed during qualification. Should those be adjusted in this case? @Richard Shomaker Thanks for this reference Richard. I do not have the larger extension you listed for the Z axis, but I would be curious how the results would compare. I'll look more into this if I can. @Jack Nelson.2 I was referring to the rigidity values taken from the stylus system management tab on the CMM. I do not believe SSC gives a rigidity estimation.

Hi, this could be caused by the following: This error occurs after incorrectly copying the configuration and can be resolved as follows: Open the values file in the following directory with a text editor: C:\Users\Public\Documents\Zeiss\CALYPSO 8.0\config\env Search for the following term: piWebPreviewTemplate Replace the highlighted section between the first and last brackets with the following method: -> #piWebPreviewTemplate -> (UI.OMCarefulValueHolder with: (#system -> 'PlotProtocol.ptx')) Best Regards Marcel

In Germany, you cannot purchase a license as a private individual. Here the price will be ca. 15 k€.

Oh, I see. It's a profit thing. If you sell it, it's one less customer for them.

Depending on your ZEISS INSPECT version, the situation could be improved by adding the corresponding import statement. E.g. after importing `gom.api` you would get file completions for that module. But anyways, we are working on a better solution.

Hi Cyril, there is an elarning aviailable. It covers everything from creating the deformation model to the virtual clamping process: "INSPECT (De-Warp - Virtual Clamping of Rigid Parts) eLearning" https://zeiss.csod.com/ Nanno

@Tom Oakes Probably wouldn't approve selling to the Taliban 🤣

I've always gone by the Modulus of Elasticity. I didn't know SSC would give me rigidity values. Where can I find them?

This guide might be a little out of date, but it is still relevant for the most part. Thanks, JG FastStart Guide for Calypso 2018 Rev 2.0 11152018.pdf

Hi Nanno, Thanks for your answer ! It works 🙂 Do you know if a quick training module exists for De-warp please ? Thanks a lot, Cyril

You can try that. I've done it before. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't...