All Activity

Du hast recht, das habe ich übersehen.

Hallo ist es möglich bei Calypso eine Form oder Rundheit ohne Eingabe einer Toleranz auch nicht 0,000 das der Messwert nicht automatisch rot ist sondern quasi immer grün. Danke

Eben das Feature nutzen wir ja bereits seit einigen Jahren, und wir waren damals in Kontakt mit Robert Disser. 🙂 Für das was künftig kommt, reicht das aber so nicht mehr. Jetzt müssten wir quasi noch einen oben drauf setzen. Aktuell sind wir aber noch nicht so weit, daß wir die konkreten Anforderungen schon benennen könnten.

I imagine a 4 hour course with her constantly staring and smiling into the "camera", never even moving her head, never getting a dry toungue, twittering along like a bird all the time without ever taking a single breath. Better don't let that become a habit, Carl...I literally didn't get a single word. My brain doesn't work that fast, you know...

@Norbert Bendl Diese Option sollte eigentlich korrekt dokumentiert werden, in der letzten Release-Info ist dies leider abgeschnitten worden mit dem Satz: Im eigentlichen BUG kam danach noch der Zusatz mit UTF_8_BOM=1 / UTF_8_BOM=0, dies ist hoffentlich in den kommenden Patch-Notes korrigiert. Bzgl. dem zusätzlichen QDAS Datensatz gibt es eine Möglichkeit mit 2 verschiedenen qdasconv.con's zu arbeiten, dies läuft jedoch alles über unseren Kollegen Robert Disser, der macht solche speziellen Sachen immer im Rahmen einer Anwendungstechnischen Unterstützung vor Ort beim Kunden, da dies schon mit viel zusätzlichen Batch Dateien und Konfigurationen verbunden ist. Falls Interesse besteht kann dies über training.metrology.de@zeiss.com bei den Kollegen von der Schulungsabteilung angefragt werden. Gruß Marcel

Korrekt. Laut Standard ist die Konzentrizität zweier Kreise der Abstand der Mittelpunkte zwischen Datumskreis und tolerierenden Kreis nachdem diese auf eine gemeinsame Ebene projiziert wurden. Der Datumkreis ist ein Hüllelement (laut ISO 5459) und der zu tolerierende Kreis ist ein Best-Fit-Kreis (laut ISO 17450-3). Genauer gesagt, definiert die ISO den Kreis nicht, daher haben wir Kreise als Zylinder der Höhe 0 interpretiert. Und da sagt die ISO halt, das für die Mittelpunktbestimmung Best-Fit-Mathematik zu benutzen ist. Die Punkte werden natürlich für die Entfernungsauswertung noch in eine gemeinsame Ebene projiziert, aber das sollte keinen Unterschied machen, da die Kreisebenen ja parallel sein sollten. Um sich den Effekt der Fittingmethode zu veranschaulichen, können Sie ja einfach mal jeweils einen Bestfit-Kreis und einen Hüllkreis auf denselben Daten anlegen und die Entfernung zwischen den Mittelpunkten messen. Ich würde erwarten, dass diese Entfernung nicht 0 ist und auch für die beiden Kreise unterschiedlich ist

Good morning, Suddenly my machine won't move on the "y" axis, it won't let me zero it, and I'm getting the following error in the status window: 4 Movement command discarded, final motor stages not ready. 488 CAN Device. It looks like I'll need to call a technician, but I was hoping someone could help me in any way. Thank you.

Although it is probably the least likely cause, may I ask what kind of parts we talk about? If it's plastic or otherwise molded parts, they usually have draft angles and I cannot count the number of prints I've seen where even the designer wasn't able to hit the correct one of two edges (start or end of draft) in 2D dimensioning.

Es ist ein rotationssymmetrisches Bauteil. Somit gibt es nur eine Kreisringfläche. Die Angabe in Pos. 1 ist somit korrekt. Die Pos. 7 legt den Ort der Toleranzzone fest.

Hello Karin, Great, thank you for the explanations and support.

Hello, No i don't have any experience with scripting.

With 'define circle on cylinder'

Version 8.0 calypso 2025 CAD format- .prt

I'm not sure you're overall part size, but its all gonna come down to data quality and resolution, I'm not as familiar with the tscan hawk, but i'd recommend an ATOS Q 12m ~100mv. You dont want garbage in or you're gonna get garbage out. construct a nominal surface--> MP Fitting element and reduce the normal deviation significantly. use that actual selection in a surface comparison as opposed to a gdnt profile, tweak the opening angle and normal deviation. have you looked into a zeiss cmm with an active scanning sensor/probe? those things can traverse over some pretty large deviations...

If you would like to use a singular point, you could use a an "offset point". The offset would be the distance between the elements. Once you have all of the elements on the same plane, then you can select all four points and use a fitting plane.

I realize this was a long time ago, but just confirming that what Henrik Lindahl says is definitely true. This is almost definitely a typo / misunderstanding by the design engineer (I made the same mistake which is what brough me here). If your secondary datum is a cylinder perpendicular to your primary, then it provides no additional orientation data that isn't already communicated by the primary datum A so it is unnecessary. If they were trying control orientation of the pattern of features (FRTZF) with the second frame, they should have specified all datums, (A, B, and C). There isn't a great example of this in ASME Y14.5, but figure 10-43 is close (the hole pattern is radial, but it includes a secondary datum that is a bore perpendicular to primary

How are you extracting the features out of the model? With define points?

Version of Calypso? File format of CAD? I have never face this - only if model was not correct, but models from SolidWorks ( in SAT and IGES ) are correct once i extract key features for base alignment and setup. Other extracted features are then ok.

When you use this option, the settings are applied to any characteristic that you create. In essence, the end result is the same. The only differences are 1) the features used for your base alignment do not get the benefit of having filters and outliers applied to them and 2) when looking the features, you might see differences in actual values vs. the results on the report. Unfortunately, when using this option, the Outlier Elimination settings for pre-filters don't change between circular and linear features. Maybe someone will post that it doesn't matter. In my 2nd Basic class in 2008, the instructor suggested just checking all 12 checkboxes and followed with that it was better use the default settings even though they may not be the correct settings. In other words, the wrong settings are better than no settings.

Capitalize the 'W' and it should work -- .printStringWithoutExponentF Could also try .asNumeralString and .decimalString

This happens with all CADs. there's no issue in alignment and references.

Lets say I set up my default filter/outlier settings, ex: Then I extract a feature. I notice that in the Evaluation settings, Filter/Outlier isn't toggled on by default, even with the default settings set up. My question: Do I still need to toggle them on to get to them to work? Or are they automatically on in the background because I set up the defaults, and I only need to toggle them on if I want different settings from the default?

Has anyone ever used the title name's extension? I found it in the PCM cookbook. It doesn't seem to accomplish what it says it does, or anything for that matter. But I'm also a novice, and not sure if I'm applying it right. every attempt I've made, the "d" is still there. Not a big deal at all, mostly just curious if I'm too stupid to apply it, or if it just doesn't work.

What Keith and Richard said. The likely difference between the reported flatness and the Min./Max. in the grid you referenced in PiWeb relates to the alignment that the Min./Max. are generated from. Flatness uses minimum feature as the standard evaluation method, which isolates the unrelated mating envelope (i.e. doesn't relate to a datum reference frame). This is a key advantage of digital systems such as a CMM. The feature can be isolated to itself to evaluate form characteristics such as flatness.

The Max is 0.0038, and the Min is 0.0000 = 0.0038 Flatness. It's location is just where it is respective to its alignment - flatness is irrelevant to location/orientation.