[To...] Posted July 8, 2022 Share Posted July 8, 2022 I'm looking for some ideas on how to measure any single blade from a group of four with minimal modifications. I would prefer to not have 4 sets of curves, 1 for each blade to keep feature editing to a minimum, i.e. changes to strategy apply to any of the 4 positions like a pattern would do. I am doing a 3d Best Fit on the blade, so that would need to be portable, too. As I am writing this, I am contemplating creating a simple 3d best fit base alignment, instead of a standard base alignment from the hub features. In other words, I would do a manual alignment on the front side of a blade blade I want to run, like a start alignment, then let a second 3d best fit alignment run on all 4 sides of the blade run in a loop for the curves. I think I may have answered my one question though I would still like to hear from the creativeness of the forum. Cheers....blade check.JPG Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/10052-suggestions-please/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted July 8, 2022 Share Posted July 8, 2022 Zeiss T-Scan Hawk or ATOS-Q with GOM Inspect - might even need Blade Inspect. 🙂 Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/10052-suggestions-please/#findComment-47830 Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ch...] Posted July 8, 2022 Share Posted July 8, 2022 Please sign in to view this quote. I measure a lot of rotational parts with complex geometries and no clocking feature. Make a curve best fit alignment from one blade. Then measure all other blades back to it. Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/10052-suggestions-please/#findComment-47832 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in