Jump to content

Tips for measuring this tool


Recommended Posts

Hello,

i have to measure position of sphere made of cutting edges on this tool.
Any advices? I tried 3 circles with unknown contour 1mm speed and 0,05mm step.
Points recalled to sphere with outliers 2,0 20reps and clear to element ( lost in translation ).

It gives me 36,18 diameter - it should be 36mm tool.

We are looking for tool setup on machine where length of tool will be flat on top. 3001_a980c7c490d076c3638010ef9d3c9eca.jpg
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/11000-tips-for-measuring-this-tool/
Share on other sites

I tried to scan it counter clockwise to avoid edge jumps.
Still i don't know how to properly filter it. Can not use outer tangential on sphere and with three circles i don't trust to results made with cuts.

Yes, testing this on sample would be best option, but we have similar problem with other tool, where due renewing by grinding we get R2 length mismatch ( aka it's upper or lower than it is programmed ). This should solve optical devices which should be at machines ( we are talking about it for min. 6 years )
Like Norbert said, if there's a clearance angle it'll be impossible to measure exactly on the cutting edge.

The only thing I can think of is to create each cutting edge as an intersection, but that only works if the clearance surface and the flute are "standard" shapes, like planes and spheres, which they likely aren't. If they're freeform surfaces, I don't think you can create intersections.
Nowadays CAD should be available from the supplier. Calling the maker and asking how it is made may give insight to measuring. A short video would be great.

As mentioned, measuring a sharp edge is near impossible. An alignment for each flute would be needed due to how this is probably made. Pick a depth. Then create a scanning line perpendicular to the cutting face and clearance of the flute where the cutting edge and clearance intersect. Pull the Maximum Point from the line. Repeat for each flute. Then repeat for different depths. Recall the maximum points into a sphere, hopefully Calypso will allow that, I would make a rough program with 5 maximum points to test before making more points.

But as mentioned, the real result will be when the part is cut. So many factors in machining can alter the end results.

Please sign in to view this quote.

Thanks for your reply.
This is custom made tool - unfortunately we can not find drawing for this, so I was told to measure it as close as we can get something to set up at mill.

Now I can play with it since I am not needed too much.
To measure cutting edges you can qualify the carbide stem of a stylus and use this to measure the edge. To accomplish this, qualify the same stylus tip twice, say once as tip #1 and once as tip #2, then manually edit the stylus coordinates and diameter until a circle measured with the shaft on the calibration sphere yields the same location and diameter as the stylus sphere.
For measurement, the part should be aligned physically as close as possible to the CMM -a rotary table makes it much easier to get very close.
I would make an alignment using cylinder as primary and 2 translations. Then the plane at flute to stop rotation. You should be able to calculate the truncated portion of radius and set that as your Z tertiary with offset amount. That will allow you to create a circle in each alignment ,with a controlled immersion depth on cutting edge. You should be able to calculate where the circle center is, then measure roughly a quadrant. Repeat this on all flutes, and recall into sphere with correct nominals. If you want to bypass that, try creating the sphere first with rings of single point measurements from (30°-90 °) ? coverage. You could measure 3 strategies clocked in small increments and use O.T.E as this is what the cutter will make.
×
×
  • Create New...