Jump to content

True position or concentricity


Recommended Posts

Question to the experts. I have a part 170mm long 6.00mm Ø (some areas smaller).
The customer drawing calls out true position at various locations on the shaft, but are
open to changes because of bad repeatability from a previous program strategy.

The only datum is -A- which is the 6.00mm OD. The tip of the part is split down the middle
lengthwise for 25.00mm and they want it's position as well.
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/11644-true-position-or-concentricity/
Share on other sites

True position will give you the same answer as concentricity. For ISO and in Calypso, concentricity is just a special case of position in which both features share the same axis. David is spot on about making your Datum A as long as possible. You want to eliminate as much projection error as possible.

Concentricity was obsoleted in the latest Y14.5 release in favor of position or runout.
.
Clarke,

I'd recommend the DRF mentioned above with runout as the characteristic to control the feature of interest. Runout controls form, orientation and location. You can simultaneously evaluate wobble, roundness issues and axis offset. Runout works great not just for rotating parts but any coaxial features of size.


Jeff Frodermann
Meier Tool & Engineering
Anoka, Minnesota
×
×
  • Create New...