[Te...] Posted April 1, 2021 Share Posted April 1, 2021 Has anyone had luck trying to get the graphic (percentage of tolerance) to be correct for a Result Element with a hard zero? In the Calibration Programs for the Stylus Systems I use Result Element to get the Ball Diameter and the Sigma (dev) for each stylus. In the Custom Report if you unchecked the lower tolerance it calculated it correctly but it makes no difference in PiWeb so my Sigma Deviation of up to 0.010 always wants to make the nominal 0.005 not 0.000 which makes it look bad and if I add warning limits I am guessing it might turn yellow even though it is really good. Any ideas on how to fix this? I even think the deviation number comes from the 0.005 not 0.000 Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/12502-graphic-with-hard-zero-with-result-element/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
[No...] Posted June 25, 2021 Share Posted June 25, 2021 Hello Ted This is possible with Calypso 7.2. See attachmentNatural_Limit.png Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/12502-graphic-with-hard-zero-with-result-element/#findComment-62634 Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Te...] Posted June 28, 2021 Author Share Posted June 28, 2021 Thanks, that is nice to know. Wait for Zeiss to send me my new license files so I can play with 2021 on my offline seat. Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/12502-graphic-with-hard-zero-with-result-element/#findComment-62636 Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Te...] Posted July 15, 2021 Author Share Posted July 15, 2021 Going into to PiWeb reporting plus in settings and changing to nominal seemed to help the deviation understand the hard zero but the graphic is still incorrect. Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/12502-graphic-with-hard-zero-with-result-element/#findComment-62638 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in