Jump to content

DRF


Recommended Posts

Please sign in to view this quote.

Thanks Andreas. I just see an exaggerated deviation of a cone that doesn't represent most cases of this type of situation. If design was correct, there would be controls in regard to orientation to the -A- cone, like perpendicularity of a lower precedented face. If I saw a part like what you've graciously drawn up for us and there weren't any controls for features back to -A-, I would be sending that back for drawing review or revision change.
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/12700-drf/page/2/#findComment-63704
Share on other sites

Please sign in to view this quote.

Andreas,

You can't use a cone as a datum simulator for a cylinder. The simulator must be the "true geometric counterpart" of the datum feature. In this case, it must be a cylinder.

What questions do you have about Y14.5.1? For obvious copyright reasons, I can't just post the document.
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/12700-drf/page/2/#findComment-63706
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...