Jump to content

Position Help


Recommended Posts

I would measure a circle on each 8.3 hole and recall feature points of both circles into a cylinder1, measure two circles on the 48 hole and "recall" (not "recall feature points") into a 3D line, and measure plane B how ever you need to(single points/circle path?) Open a position characteristic, select the cylinder as a feature, 3D line as primary, plane B as secondary and if it makes a difference, the cylinder as tertiary.
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/14020-position-help/#findComment-72692
Share on other sites

Measure the two Ø8.3 holes as Cylinders.

Measure Datum A as a Cylinder (minimum of 3 circle paths). Measure Datum B as a Plane.

Drop in a Position - Change it to a Bore Pattern. Datum A as the Primary Datum, Datum B as the Secondary Datum, and there is no need to fill in the Tertiary Datum. Inside of the Bore Pattern, select your two Ø8.3 Cylinders, and turn off Translation (keep only Rotation checked).
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/14020-position-help/#findComment-72696
Share on other sites

Please sign in to view this quote.

You´re right 😉
According to the drawing, you will only have to consider the theoretical distance 9.5 but not the angular position of the bore.
As we don´t know the fonction of this part, I cannot say if it make sense or not. My experience would rather say that the (CZ) modifier is missing...
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/14020-position-help/#findComment-72708
Share on other sites

I don't know purpose of those two holes, but there should fit one through-all pin with CZ on drawing or 2 short pins.
Machining it will be difficult to keep them lined-up, but it will depend on rod which comes in ( 2 separate holes? or one )

Discuss with customer if you don't know what's comes in d48 G3
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/14020-position-help/#findComment-72710
Share on other sites

Please sign in to view this quote.

We are remaking this part and I evaluated this part how you stated above. I know have a difference between the two styles of evaluation.

If i evaluate with default settings and don't select bore pattern i have a deviation of .060 microns

If i evaluate with the bore pattern selected and turning the translation off i have a deviation of .021-.030" depending on which hole.

How is calypso evaluating each hole between the two evaluation methods. I'm trying to explain this to the President and im unsure of the difference between the two.

Also how do i give the operator feedback about correction when i'm unsure of which direction the hole is off?
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/14020-position-help/#findComment-72714
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...