[Va...] Posted September 3, 2020 Share Posted September 3, 2020 This will hopefully be a simple question and answer. What is the formula that Calypso uses to calculate parallelism? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[SH...] Posted September 3, 2020 Share Posted September 3, 2020 Please sign in to view this quote. IMG_20200903_194236.jpgIMG_20200903_194223.jpgIMG_20200903_194210.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted September 3, 2020 Share Posted September 3, 2020 It's not only Calypso. It's standard defined in norms ( ASME, ISO ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Da...] Posted September 3, 2020 Share Posted September 3, 2020 Please sign in to view this quote. Give us something more. What are you working with? Plane to plane? Cylinder axis? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[An...] Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 Please sign in to view this quote. A question,coming up in this context. See attached.Pic_3-28_b.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[SH...] Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 Please sign in to view this quote. I have not seen projected tolerance for parallelism. I think it is used for axis not plane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 Projected zone in position is useless for planes. For axis it is - almost always it it used for assembly check. For parallelism it is nonsence. Even that diameter sign in P is nonsence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[An...] Posted September 7, 2020 Share Posted September 7, 2020 Please sign in to view this quote. Transformation of a plane into a 3D Line. See attached.Contribution_07_09_2020_a.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted September 7, 2020 Share Posted September 7, 2020 Please sign in to view this quote. OK, that's out of my knowledge 😃 We have never saw or used here, so we have no experience with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[SH...] Posted September 7, 2020 Share Posted September 7, 2020 Please sign in to view this quote. Really, it is a hard nut to crack!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[An...] Posted September 8, 2020 Share Posted September 8, 2020 See attached.Contribution_08_09_2020.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Jo...] Posted September 10, 2020 Share Posted September 10, 2020 Please sign in to view this quote. Then don't call it nonsense if you don't even know what it is to begin with. If the feature that is being controlled is a cylindrical feature then you can use the diameter symbol to indicate that the tolerance zone is cylindrical. This controls the parallelism of the axis with respect to two perpendicular datums if that's the desired control. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Da...] Posted September 11, 2020 Share Posted September 11, 2020 Please sign in to view this quote. I wasn’t gonna say anything to this one, but it was not about the parallelity of an axis to another feature, this was about a projected tolerance zone of a plane, which can be done diametrically, but of course the projection zone can be cartesian, too. Instead of the diameter symbol, you could specify a tolerance zone "16/16". So the P symbol does not force a diametrical tolerance zone. But that’s the only thing that needs correction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in