Jump to content

roll reading on a cylindrical part.


Recommended Posts

Got a tough one. I have a customer who wants a size over a .750 pin that is contacting an od cylinder and a conical surface that's concentric to the cylinder, to the back end of the part ( plane). I've already worked out various intersection lengths and intersection positions, so the part is checked and good, BUT, he wants the " over the pin reading " included if I can...so Thems fightin words to me 🤣 🤣
Did this a long time ago but it involved planes , not cylinders and cones. I just have to get to the center of a circle that's tangent to both ACTUAL surfaces.
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/14766-roll-reading-on-a-cylindrical-part/
Share on other sites

I would love to know how a comparison between the Tangent method vs Curve in contour fit.... Tangent has worked for me 100% of the time; Curve in contour fit worked the one time I used it, but didn't seem as repeatable. Hopefully these are more "fightin' words" 🤣
There is no repetabillity issues with circle in contour, as a feature. As Shomaker mentioned, If you cant get it to repeat, then you should have a look at your curve, its most likely poor.

To get really good curve measurements can many times be a very time consuming job. It takes a little more effort then just slicing, throw in some points and apply suggested filter....

Please sign in to view this quote.

Curve scanned with CFS.0004 point spacing (1100 points) over the contour (40 degrees).
Filter setting (Spline 0.2500 mm), Outlier settings (Inside = 3/Outside = 3), only outlier.
What's missing here?

All done by Zeiss, and won't repeat worth a crap. I switched it to Tangent, repeats perfectly.
150_d9c79bda2b428512629d9ea7352c105d.png
150_fda55084ca1ef27f7caca7dc5781eaef.png
×
×
  • Create New...