Jump to content

PCD hole checking


Recommended Posts

Please sign in to view this quote.

Yes, it is pitch circle diameter,l don't know, in the drawing it mentioned like that.
Using formula l can only calculate the diameter of individual holes with respect to centre. I want to calculate diameter including two holes.
Or
I have to calculate two diameter and add it then divided by two??
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/15270-pcd-hole-checking/#findComment-82180
Share on other sites

Thats a terrible callout....... the only thing i can think of would be to cheat and create some 'added' data points (read false data points) by creating a couple theoretical circles where the X&Y are "(getActual (circle1),x)*-1", so that circle will appear in the opposite quadrant than the actual circle.
You'll end up with 4 points of data, but i don't know if it will be any good.
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/15270-pcd-hole-checking/#findComment-82188
Share on other sites

If you convert the polar coordinates into a circle and use the tolerance of 0.2 mm, you get a pitch circle diameter of Ø 76.532 mm with full (+) tolerance and a Ø 75.438 mm with full (-) tolerance.
The tolerance of + - 0.2 mm for the specified pitch circle diameter can only work if the polar coordinates are precisely maintained.
If I calculate the polar coordinate with a (+) tolerance and the other with a (-) tolerance, the dimension is still within the required tolerance of the pitch circle diameter!

The tolerance of one polar coordinate may only be + - 0.1 mm, the other may only be + - 0.05 mm, only then can the tolerance of 0.2 mm of the pitch circle diameter be maintained!
It would be better to provide the two polar coordinates with a tolerance of +- 0.05mm, then the pitch circle diameter is always within the required tolerance.
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/15270-pcd-hole-checking/#findComment-82190
Share on other sites

Hello Shabu,
I did the math.
I have some pairings here.

This mating would fit, but it's dangerous because the worker
one polar coordinate with (+) tolerance, the other must machine with (-) tolerance.
Calculated with full tolerance utilization.

18,80mm / 33,10mm = Ø 76,132mm pitch circle diameter
19,20mm / 32,70mm = Ø 75,840mm pitch circle diameter


With this pairing, the tolerance of +- 0.2mm of the polar coordinates cannot be
fully exploited, if one would do so, the tolerance of the pitch circle diameter will be exceeded.

18.94mm / 32.84mm = Ø 75.820mm pitch circle diameter
19,08mm / 32,98mm = Ø 76,202mm pitch circle diameter


If the polar tolerance were set to + - 0.05mm, the tolerance of the pitch circle diameter would always be conform
if the tolerance was fully utilized.

Tolerance greatest against greatest 19.05mm / 32.95mm = Ø 76.120mm
Tolerance smallest against smallest 18,95mm / 32,85mm = Ø 75,846mm
Tolerance largest against smallest 19,05mm / 32,85mm = Ø 75,948mm
Tolerance smallest against largest 18,95mm / 32,95mm = Ø 76,020mm

I think you should talk to the designer about which dimensions are more important to him.
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/15270-pcd-hole-checking/#findComment-82192
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...