[ch...] Posted February 5, 2020 Share Posted February 5, 2020 I rotate my probe only xy plane but while calibrating it shows it rotate about y z plane also, calibration result is good. It is my mistake or usual in calibrating angle probe.lt also tells different angles second time calibration.But calibration result is perfect no problem??IMG_20200205_085114.jpgIMG_20200205_083222.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[He...] Posted February 5, 2020 Share Posted February 5, 2020 Values are where you touched. Sets one angle to 0 degrees. This is how the calibration is carried out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ch...] Posted February 5, 2020 Share Posted February 5, 2020 Here's what you do. Manually calibrate it like you did. The first time thru just guess on the angles when Calypso prompts you. Then probe the reference sphere with the shank of the probe until you have the cylinder. Look at the angle of the cylinder and that is your probe angle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted February 6, 2020 Share Posted February 6, 2020 What the prompt is saying is a best guess at your probing vector when you take the first point. At this window you can correct your nominal angles so say Z/Y should be zero so you are at the center of the ball not high or low with a probing vector that drives in only X and Y. I would assume the X/Y would be a 30 degree so you type that in as well. I always turn my speed down before hitting continue because the stylus will take off and continue qualification with the corrected vectors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[SH...] Posted February 6, 2020 Share Posted February 6, 2020 Please sign in to view this quote. Probing reference sphere with Shank is legal method? should we do it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Jo...] Posted February 6, 2020 Share Posted February 6, 2020 Please sign in to view this quote. This was taught in Calypso Basic course. It is only to get vector of probe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ch...] Posted February 6, 2020 Share Posted February 6, 2020 John is correct. This is what they are teaching at training to find the exact vector of the probe. One interesting thing I have noticed is that the probes in which I've input the exact vector seem to quality with a slightly lower S value than probes that the exact vector was not input. This even worked on probes that were in line with an axis to the CMM. For example, even if my probe is close to 0 degrees, it is not exact. I assume this has to do with the CMM doing less probe radius correction??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Mi...] Posted February 6, 2020 Share Posted February 6, 2020 They went over the shank measuring in Aukom II last yr. Measure then do the probe/stem compensation. Nice trick actually Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ch...] Posted February 6, 2020 Share Posted February 6, 2020 It really gave me the heebie-jeebies the first time I touched the reference sphere with the shank. Took me a while to get used to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in