[Ja...] Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 I have an I.D. Sphere that measures roughly Ø15.25". The print is asking for .001 Profile of a Surface to no datums. I have about 1" of the sphere in height - not much of the surface at all. Also, the O.D. to I.D. thickness is less than a half inch. Is this reasonable on a CMM? Preliminary results: 6 Measurements, Largest measurement - Smallest measurement = .0009 : This would lead me to assume the repeatability of the measurement is equal to the tolerance and therefore we shouldn't try. Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/16982-small-profile-large-sphere/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ro...] Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 I use points instead of scanning when dealing with small sections of a sphere. Ive found 12-15 points to be very good for size and location.12 points-2.png Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/16982-small-profile-large-sphere/#findComment-95002 Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Er...] Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 But if you have a profile with out any datums, location is unimportant, and 12 points is not enough to accuratly determin form errors. (depending on size of the feature) In your case I would have used ~250 points with the tolerance in mind. If you are scanning, reduce speed and consider a larger probe diameter for better mechanical filter if repetabillity is an issue. Also make sure your paths of scanning dont contain any step change in direction. Thats what I would try first. Or just take 5 points and report form 🙂 Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/16982-small-profile-large-sphere/#findComment-95004 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in