[Ja...] Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 I have an I.D. Sphere that measures roughly Ø15.25". The print is asking for .001 Profile of a Surface to no datums. I have about 1" of the sphere in height - not much of the surface at all. Also, the O.D. to I.D. thickness is less than a half inch. Is this reasonable on a CMM? Preliminary results: 6 Measurements, Largest measurement - Smallest measurement = .0009 : This would lead me to assume the repeatability of the measurement is equal to the tolerance and therefore we shouldn't try. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ro...] Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 I use points instead of scanning when dealing with small sections of a sphere. Ive found 12-15 points to be very good for size and location.12 points-2.png Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Er...] Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 But if you have a profile with out any datums, location is unimportant, and 12 points is not enough to accuratly determin form errors. (depending on size of the feature) In your case I would have used ~250 points with the tolerance in mind. If you are scanning, reduce speed and consider a larger probe diameter for better mechanical filter if repetabillity is an issue. Also make sure your paths of scanning dont contain any step change in direction. Thats what I would try first. Or just take 5 points and report form 🙂 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in