[Me...] Posted November 13, 2019 Share Posted November 13, 2019 If I were to calibrate a probe with a setting for Sensitive or Robust for an RDS head, do I have to re-reference/calibrate the MasterProbe as Sensitive or Robust as well? Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/17254-calibration/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Is...] Posted November 13, 2019 Share Posted November 13, 2019 not sure, in my case in XXT sensors I put all probes in sensitive.. Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/17254-calibration/#findComment-96634 Share on other sites More sharing options...
[To...] Posted November 13, 2019 Share Posted November 13, 2019 Please sign in to view this quote. Do you mind me asking why? I've use XXT sensors for over 10 years and have no reason to not use "standard" except as needed for small probes or less stable probes. Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/17254-calibration/#findComment-96636 Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Am...] Posted November 13, 2019 Share Posted November 13, 2019 I keep my Master at standard and just use what is needed for the rest of the probes. The only ones i really use sensitive is some of the really long probes on the O-Inspect. Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/17254-calibration/#findComment-96638 Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Is...] Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 Please sign in to view this quote. I don't have an accurate answer for that, We were developing scannings since ever with active sensors (Prismos in Lab and Gagemax in shopfloor), no significant problems between machines. Then because advantages in cost and space, I installed in 2014 couple Duramax in shop floor using a program developed in a Prismo with VAST sensor.. Was my first experience with Vast XXT and the results were not the expected, after some time we achieve acceptable results without the need to use different programs. Not sure exactly how much this contributes but at that time we noticed a better performance using sensitive calibration, and reading the Calypso documentation we found that was recommendable for high precision, slow speed and small stylus diameters; In that case we were evaluating some distances (+/- 0.015 mm) extracted from curves. Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/17254-calibration/#findComment-96640 Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Cl...] Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 Please sign in to view this quote. We have a few programs scanning curves on very small geometry, using a 0.2mm Ø ruby - setting to sensitive a must. Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/17254-calibration/#findComment-96642 Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 In the case of DuraMax and O-Inspect machines, I'm not as certain on the sensitive vs standard being the main issue. Most of it stems from the probing dynamics. The mechanical machines tend to need to be ran in to 20-30% range. If you are working with probes smaller than 0.5mm then 10-15% is recomennded. Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/17254-calibration/#findComment-96644 Share on other sites More sharing options...
[To...] Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 Please sign in to view this quote. Understood. I agree. I was asking why because Israel made it sound like he was doing it for "all" probes. Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/17254-calibration/#findComment-96646 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in