[To...] Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 I have a cone with a profileform with a tolerance of 0,02. It has no reference. What is the best way to do this? My results are not very uniform and I think they should be when I look at the process in the lathe. What I have done is making a new alignment with with the cone as z and y which will give me the location of the center axis of the cone. I have checked both position and angularity and these give me same result. The result is something like 0,0085. I am not able to add any pictures right now , but I will do tonight. Hope I made myself understandable. Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/17354-profile-form-without-ref/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 I would create a Free-Form surface, and recall the feature points of the Cone. Make sure to associate the surface of the Cone with the Free-Form by selecting the surface in the CAD model window. Then inside of the Profile characteristic, use the Free-Form as the feature to be evaluated, and tell it no datum reference frame. It will best-fit the data for you. Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/17354-profile-form-without-ref/#findComment-97248 Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Me...] Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 What happens if you do not select the surfaces when recalling into the FFS? A lot of my features that I do the recall with are created with section lines and circles so I uncheck the recalculate nominals and it seems to be logical. I did not know you're supposed to select the surfaces on the model though. Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/17354-profile-form-without-ref/#findComment-97250 Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 Please sign in to view this quote. I believe it doesn't reference the nominals off the CAD. I could be wrong about that though. I would need to test to confirm. Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/17354-profile-form-without-ref/#findComment-97252 Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Me...] Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 Let me know because I'm worried now. I would tend to think that since I'm using created features off the model by sectioning, the nominals directly reflect the model. Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/17354-profile-form-without-ref/#findComment-97254 Share on other sites More sharing options...
[To...] Posted November 2, 2019 Author Share Posted November 2, 2019 I did try to do free form surface on the cone but the stylus went mad and didn't hit the cone very well. Did a lot of scan in the air instead of on the part. So angle were checked and it were perfect angle. I will try recalling the circles from the cone into a freeform surface and linking the surface to the cone. Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/17354-profile-form-without-ref/#findComment-97256 Share on other sites More sharing options...
[To...] Posted November 4, 2019 Author Share Posted November 4, 2019 Thank you very much for the help. I tried evaluating the last part that ran on our CMM. It went from a profileform with a deviation of 0.04 with base alignment as reference to 0.015 when having the CAD as reference. So recalling features points into a free form surface, linking the free form surface to the cone and making a new alignment from the free form surface were the solution. Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/17354-profile-form-without-ref/#findComment-97258 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in