[Cl...] Posted November 19, 2018 Share Posted November 19, 2018 What would be the best shape of zone to use here? This is a go plug. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[He...] Posted November 19, 2018 Share Posted November 19, 2018 Impossible to say without seeing the drawing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Cl...] Posted November 19, 2018 Author Share Posted November 19, 2018 This go plug fits into an ID part cavity Gage (length/width) basic dimensions are .3958 x .1588 Part (length/width) basic dimensions are .397 x .160 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Br...] Posted November 19, 2018 Share Posted November 19, 2018 What does the Profile tolerance FCF look like? Is this Y14.5-2009? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[An...] Posted November 20, 2018 Share Posted November 20, 2018 Your component must certainly be able to pair with another component! I would use "Inwards into infinity" to determine the largest deviation outside the component! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Cl...] Posted November 20, 2018 Author Share Posted November 20, 2018 So for the No-Go end, I apply "Outwards into infinity"? This makes more sense now, as I am seeing a slight plus mat'l condition on the No-go end, and a slightly minus mat'l condition on the Go end. The graphic from the CAD evaluation appears to correlate with the profile results. Thanks Andreas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in