Jump to content

Warning: The speed is to high


Recommended Posts

Please sign in to view this quote.

Yes. As mentioned, the function does not like scans that are less than 360 degrees. You may need to create intersections at different angles for both sides of the scan... Depending on what you are trying to accomplish, you might also consider evaluating Outer Tangential & Inner Tangential sizes, along with a Roundness result (?)

Ünal, it gives, you just need to group the sections.

Brad, do you did that?

Keith, no, you need no intersections or something else for the two-point-diameter, you just need to goup the section. Of course that only works in that angles, where opposite points are given

Unbenannt.JPG

Edited

Martin, no it changes only the evaluation of the circle: it tells calypso, that it is a full circle, or, that the two segments should be handled like one section. I do that very(!) often, because I use 2-point-diameter very often (it´s ISO default-evaluation).

 

an example for better understanding: when you have measured points of a circle in a txt-file, and you want to recall them from that txt and evaluate it as 2-point-diameter, then the first line in the txt has to be "TypeOfScanningPath=Circle" (without quotes). If it´s not, you can not evaluate as 2-point-diameter (you can as LSQ, as MCE, as MIE, as OTE), because calypso needs to be told, that it´s a full (scanned) circle, not single-points.

Please sign in to view this quote.

That is the problem right there.  In order to calculate 2 point, it has to be a continuous 360 degrees with an even number of points.  You could not do a circle with for instance 17 points but a full 360 degrees.  It will not calculate it.

×
×
  • Create New...