Make this make sense

[[Ca...]]

 

Position is different if I pick individual datums vs base alignment. They both should be the same? Also if I calculate position, it should not be 0.4073 ( 2√(0.0843²+0.0167²)

[[Ma...]]

I think you should have selected: Plane A, 3d Line1, Circle B - i don't want to use this type definition of an alignment. I rather use normal alignment, where is realy shown where is origin.

Unless you have not fully defined alignment.

[[Cl...]]

I think I remember seeing a post not long ago talking about the difference between

two alignments using the exact Datum's, as in this instance.

I thought it had something to do with Evaluation Method for Datum - 

LSQ Feature

Outer tangential feature

ISO 5459

[[Ca...]]

Is this a bug? https://imgur.com/GQz3TUi

[[Ma...]]

I would rather fill circle B as third datum.

[[Ca...]]

Print called position to A and B only. So lets say if print called to A only, do I still have to filled out and put in B and C?

[[Ma...]]

I would fill all three with same feature for only A.

Or do your research about values. Like intersectioned circle, there you will have really one point.

[[Ca...]]

This is more confusing than anything. If print called for position to AB and I can't just plug in A and B. Depending on combinations of base alignment and/or A and B, I get like four different results.

Edited Friday at 03:57 PM

[[Cl...]]

It would be interesting to see what the result would be if you created a secondary alignment with A&B and evaluated to that.

[[Ca...]]

The result is same as base alignment.