Jump to content

XXT Head vs Vast Head


Recommended Posts

Comparing results from a XXT Head to results from a Vast Head on a Prismo Navigator.

 

Not sure what type of CMM that the supplier is using but do know that they are using an XXT Head, we are using a Prismo Navigator with a VAST Head. So, the Quality Engineer is comparing results of five parts that the supplier has measured to the same five parts that we have measured. Supplier is using a XXT Head, and we are using a VAST Gold Head. Even though all the measurements from both of us are within tolerance. They are expecting only a 10% deviation in the measurements. Is this a reasonable expectation given the different CMM's and Heads? Plus not knowing how many points, speed or if they are using any filters. 

Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/24303-xxt-head-vs-vast-head/
Share on other sites

Please sign in to view this quote.

As well as how they may hold the part while it is being inspected, the alignments, temperature, part deformation over time, probe lengths and ruby size .

Quite frankly, there are a lot of variables that affect the results.

I've acquired a few grey hairs over the years working with other companies CMM report results 🙂 

Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/24303-xxt-head-vs-vast-head/#findComment-137387
Share on other sites

Please sign in to view this quote.

I think it depends on the tolerance. Does 10% equal 0.001" or 0.0001" ? In situations like this we've usually had our customer share the CMM plan with us, and then we've tried to match the probes as close as possible. This way at least all the evaluation settings were the same.

Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/24303-xxt-head-vs-vast-head/#findComment-137473
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...