[Ma...] Posted Monday at 09:43 AM Share Posted Monday at 09:43 AM (edited) Good morning everyone, I need to measure the area of an irregular shape. I created a section, then defined two points and drew a line between them. Now I need to measure the area between them. Is it possible? Edited Monday at 09:44 AM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Cl...] Posted Monday at 12:04 PM Share Posted Monday at 12:04 PM I'd measure the two radii and the large OD. Using the tangent function with the large OD and the two radii, create the two intersection points (not sure how you did). Create a local alignment from the left radius as ZX origin. For planar (X+) use the Right radius. Then us caliper or simple distance. Intersection to intersection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Cl...] Posted Monday at 12:16 PM Share Posted Monday at 12:16 PM Lo siento Marco. I thought I was in the Calypso forum. I'm not familiar with this software. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Na...] Posted Monday at 01:47 PM Share Posted Monday at 01:47 PM Hi Marco, you can check a section directly for area. If it's not closed, the ends will be connected by a line in the background for the area calculation. So you could either create the section only for the marked area, or you create another Section -> Other -> Section from points. The selection for the section from points could be inside sphere with the center point of the sphere being the symmetry point from Point 1 and Point 2 for example. Nanno Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted Tuesday at 09:56 AM Author Share Posted Tuesday at 09:56 AM Hi Nanno! First of all thank you! Ok, with some trick I made what I want, but I think the area it's not good. Look at the image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Na...] Posted Tuesday at 11:34 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 11:34 AM It will display a negative value because the vectors of the section are directed from outer side to the inside. Or is the absolute value not plausible? You could check by Operations -> Sections -> Close Gap manually and check the resulting closed section. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted Tuesday at 12:07 PM Author Share Posted Tuesday at 12:07 PM This is the window with parameter I used: could it be that the direction of the normals are wrong? Because in the window the nominal value is 0.00. Could it be that if the nominal value, due to the wrong directions of the normals, is negative it display 0.00? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted Tuesday at 12:44 PM Author Share Posted Tuesday at 12:44 PM I don't know why the image doesn't display. I attach it here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted Tuesday at 12:47 PM Author Share Posted Tuesday at 12:47 PM I don't know why the image doesn't display. I attach it here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Na...] Posted Tuesday at 01:56 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 01:56 PM The image is displayed for me. The greyed out value seems to happen in the check dialog, if the gap is quite large. After OK, the nominal value is calculated though as seen in the label. The negative sign is displayed because it's an enclosed area like an inner diameter compared to an outer diameter for example. Same would happen with volume checks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in