Jump to content

请问各位!蔡司三坐标安全平面.如何才能像海克斯康一样.删除元素和元素之前的安全平面


---
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hello Chaowei.

I was having difficulty translating all of your text to English, so that I could understand your question. 

Could you please repost your question in text? 

It appears that you're asking a question related to clearance data and a similar feature for navigation in PC-DMIS.

Thanks, and welcome to the forums.  It's great to have you here.

  • Like! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have too problems with translating into meaningful text.

I think on newer versions of Calypso you can not delete / not use safety plane, but you can have sub clearance planes, which are used defined.
But if you are asking about complex safety path, then it's not easy to do it right and safe.

  • Like! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see it very well, but it looks like the normal vector of that feature is pointing "up" in the Calypso image (toward Y+ of the base alignment)

Clearence Distance follows the normal vector of the feature.  If you want to use your 2mm Clearence Distance you'll need to transform that feature so its Z vector is pointing the direction you'd like to clear toward.  I suspect you're crashing on approach to the feature.

  • Like! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to view this quote.

Thank you very much for your reply! Since I currently use both Hexagon CMM and ZEISS CMM, I've found that Hexagon has many very useful features because they have optimizations for the Chinese market. For example:

Arrays are independent elements.

Safety planes can be deleted.

Coordinate system functions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I understand your request correctly, Calypso handles this through the use of Sub-Clearance planes. Features that share the same probe and Sub-clearance plane will navigate using the subclearance plane instead of the full primary clearance plane. There are 2 possible subclearance plane behaviors-1 in which you define a distance for that plane, in which case the probe will retract to that distance between features. The other is to leave the distance undefined, at which point the probe will move point to point without a clearance plane move at all (it still respects clearance and retract distance however). It sounds like the behavior you are looking for is the 2nd type.

  • Like! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

---

Please sign in to view this quote.

Yes! Kevin, amazing that you understood what I meant! I’m really happy! I’m just not sure if a Zeiss CMM can handle it."

“太棒了” → "great job" / "amazing"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

---

Please sign in to view this quote.

"I apologize, but I haven't come across this issue before. You may consider providing feedback to Zeiss; perhaps they will address and fix the bug."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...