[No...] Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 Ist es möglich, eine Messreihe, die bereits über Ref.-Punkte oder Flächen in eine andere transformiert wurde, wieder zu "enttransformieren"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 Not found yet. I also found, that i either don't understand how it works or it's not doing what it should but: I have 3 scans. 2nd is transformed to 1st and i don't see additional data on 1st while transforming 3rd into 1st. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Na...] Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 Man kann die eine Messreihe bearbeiten -> Messreihenabhängigkeit auf 'Abhängig' -> Messreihenabhängigkeit auf 'Unabhängig'. Dann sind sie wieder unabhängig. Please sign in to view this username. Please sign in to view this quote. I don't fully understand: The data is not displayed or the transformation does not work? Maybe it's simple and the measurements (M1, M2, ...) are set to visible, but the Measuring series 3 is not? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 Please sign in to view this username. What i saw was only 1st and 3rd. I thought i would see 1st and 2nd combined and i wanted to transform 3rd into 1st. I think i had a problem with ref. points which should be common among 2nd and 3rd, but not in 3rd and 1st. 2nd and 1st had other common ref. points. Or i just got lost on that complex part Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Aa...] Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 You can change the measurement series dependency at any time, which would "undo" the transformation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Na...] Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 Please sign in to view this quote. If 1, 2 and 3 are sharing the same reference points, 3 into one should work. If 1 and 2 share reference points, and 2 and one: Transform 3 into 2 and 2 into 1. Hope that makes sense 😄 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[No...] Posted April 27 Author Share Posted April 27 Please sign in to view this quote. Oh, doch so einfach 🤭 Werde ich heute gleich mal ausprobieren. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[No...] Posted April 27 Author Share Posted April 27 (edited) Anmerkung: Man sollte zwischen der Umschaltung von unabhängig auf abhängig keine Neuberechnung machen. Das bescherte mir einen reproduzierbaren Software-Crash. Edited April 27 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Aa...] Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 Please sign in to view this quote. 🤣 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Na...] Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Please sign in to view this quote. Please sign in to view this username. Please sign in to view this username. I could not reproduce it with a sample project in 2026 SP1. Could you please contact your local support with logs and maybe the project? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[No...] Posted 3 hours ago Author Share Posted 3 hours ago Das Projekt, wo das passierte, existiert so nicht mehr (ich erzeuge es meistens nur temporär fürs Scanning). Auch keine Logs u.ä. Ich könnte auch nicht sicher sagen, ob ich das SP1 schon installiert hatte oder nicht. Den Fall, daß ich die Transformation aufheben musste, hatte ich vorher auch noch nie und wird so schnell auch nicht mehr auftreten. Da war mir ein Fehler passiert und ich wollte nicht nochmal von vorn anfangen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in