[Ra...] Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago Hi - I was questioned about these plots about why the min/max in the corner chart doesn't add up to the overall Flatness, and I wasn't sure. Should it? I never really paid attention until now. These were (6) diameter planes compiled into (1) plane. Note: I have a few of these scans and none come close regarding the expected ABS MIN+MAX= flatness. Thanks! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ke...] Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago I would presume that the corner box values are simply "where are the min/max points located relative to the alignment", which is seperate from the Measured value that is meing evaluated to the Minimum Feature plane. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago (edited) The Max is 0.0038, and the Min is 0.0000 = 0.0038 Flatness. It's location is just where it is respective to its alignment - flatness is irrelevant to location/orientation. Edited 6 hours ago 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Je...] Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago What Keith and Richard said. The likely difference between the reported flatness and the Min./Max. in the grid you referenced in PiWeb relates to the alignment that the Min./Max. are generated from. Flatness uses minimum feature as the standard evaluation method, which isolates the unrelated mating envelope (i.e. doesn't relate to a datum reference frame). This is a key advantage of digital systems such as a CMM. The feature can be isolated to itself to evaluate form characteristics such as flatness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in