Jump to content

Max weight of a stylus system


Recommended Posts

Dustin is correct. Here is a screenshot listing the limits for the XT Gold from the sensor manual (it may be available on the portal in the Downloads-Documentation section. I dont know if it is available to customers or not) 2915_184724106a670cd61141efa8cf96bd61.png
Edit-Dustin posted his screenshot while I was posting this, beat me to it. I'll leave this since it also has the moment limit as well
Qualifies without issue. I had to create a dual reference sphere mounted on the same base. consisting of an 8mm and a 30mm The stylus system was built with one part in mind. which has several deep ID undercut diameters. So the because of that length end weight the XXT/RDS would not work.

Here's another one for a similar part.
150_ca084a435c3195b26c66368a4d99d8f3.jpg
The long block on the first stylus system, is it titanium? Did you purchase the long block (if so, from who?) or have it built?
Sorry for all the questions, but I've been starting to use similar multi probe systems due to changer limitations. We have 4 micuras and they each have 4 bay changer racks, so if I can make one system for each complicated job, then I can change out 1 bay for that job and not stop our regular production runs... [img]128_d6db47d5d852340b943fdc91932abff5.jpg
[/img]

Please sign in to view this quote.

Yes, I believe it is Titanium. I purchased from Zeiss and built all those styli systems about 11 years ago. The parts I made these styli for are multiple high-speed cutting/drilling hand pieces used for Orthopedic surgery. Managment wanted short cycle times on the CMM, so I had to come up with stylus systems that could do the most measurements with the least number of changes.
  • 1 month later...

Please sign in to view this quote.

I'm guessing the pros and cons are the same as using carbide shanks on probes:
+high rigidity/low diameter
- fragility
- relatively high cost

Am I right? I'm just trying to learn, here.

We pretty much just use 11mm diameter carbon fiber extensions, here. They're extremely light and rigid, and we can get them fairly inexpensively from ITP.

We gave up on aluminum years ago when it was discovered that aluminum extensions exhibit dramatic, slow post-assembly mechanical recoil (like a slow-acting torsion spring). This wouldn't be if they would put wrench holes at each end . But alas, aluminum extensions are the default, cheap option, so it seems everyone produces them with just one wrench hole, which means, when assembling the system, one ends up "winding the spring" in the process of tightening the connections at their ends. It's kind of a silly problem. I can't imagine it would be that much more expensive for the producers to do it right. (hint, hint) 👩‍🏫
×
×
  • Create New...