Jump to content

Cylindrical probe


Recommended Posts

One of the things that PCD does very well, and Calypso struggles at.
In PCD you can use the ball end cylinder probe just as any other probe, but in Calypso its only a cylinder.
Additionally the "Length" of the styli will change every time you do a manual alignment, so if someone on the off shift breaks a cylinder probe and manually takes hits, your whole program can get screwed up.
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/6616-cylindrical-probe/#findComment-26454
Share on other sites

Please sign in to view this quote.

I think you would quality the bottom hemisphere as one stylus (position #1), and the shaft as a second stylus as the cylinder in position #6. I did this with one of my probes, also for a rather thin 'sheet metal' type part. Just make sure you keep the 'bottom' of the cylinder above the radius.
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/6616-cylindrical-probe/#findComment-26462
Share on other sites

Please sign in to view this quote.

Exactly... It thinks it is a sphere. You can still measure features on the shaft. You just have to move the location as to where you want it measured. I have done this numerous time for capturing edges. It works well, and the spherical bottom allows you to properly qualify it.
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/6616-cylindrical-probe/#findComment-26464
Share on other sites

I think what Roberto is referring to is the issue with how parallel the sides of the cylinder to the Z axis? I would think that after you qualified the radiused end of the cylinder probe, I might create a program that measures the reference sphere further up the cylinder to see what the variation is. In other words, pick a spot on the cylinder that you want to use when measuring your parts and validate the X, Y and Radius values to suit.
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/6616-cylindrical-probe/#findComment-26466
Share on other sites

I understand that point of view.

That's why I say to not use cylinder probes because you have no guarantee that where you are measuring on the probe is properly qualified. This is because no matter what the cylinder probe isn't truly perpendicular to the workpiece - the issue is even worse on the XXT.
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/6616-cylindrical-probe/#findComment-26468
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Please sign in to view this quote.

I realize this is an old post but hopefully you guys could answer another couple questions: if Calypso calls the geometry a sphere and you qualify another position (#6), how do you do that exactly? When qualifying you have to probe in the direction of the shaft, so if you qualify it as position #6 then how do you probe the qualification sphere with the "side", so-to-speak, of the cylinder?
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/6616-cylindrical-probe/#findComment-26470
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...