Jump to content

Alignment with and without direction - what's the difference?


Recommended Posts

The Calypso 2016 release notes mentioned a revoked change in the definition of alignments:

127_ff85b680ff497becf8915ee1dcb5aba2.jpg
I never quite grasped why the two definitions shown make a difference at all. It looks like the one on the right will somehow shift the origin - why??
I never cared much about this and never had any problems, but now there's an experimental "project" of mine where this may be of importance. Can anyone explain what is happening here?
Following.

I do stuff like this sometimes and I probably need to understand the difference. But I've never noticed anything odd on my end.

One a side note, here is a document about leaving fields in the base alignment blank. Just incase anyone was interested.

Iterative Alignment.pdf

Please sign in to view this quote.

I know. But what is the difference between the two examples above? The one on the right has the axis directions for spatial and planar specified (marked in yellow), the other has not. The text and pictures seem to imply that both will result in different alignments (origin), but I don't understand why.
×
×
  • Create New...