Jump to content

profile tolerance zone


---
 Share

Recommended Posts

That's a very bad drawing - against every standards 🤣
I don't see Point G - It looks like assembly - Each text for surface profile is different.

In any doubts I would ask customer no matter what. This is not readable
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have more questions. Does the print invoke ASME Y 14.5 ? It appears they were trying to communicate an unequally disposed tolerance.

I have questions concerning Datum mobility as well. What is Datum feature B ?

Also Profile doesn't require simultaneous condition by default, so technically you could meet each FCF independently. is not correct

See correction below
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to view this quote.

Under Y14.5 profile does have simultaneous requirements by default. 1132_623b80de4663e5df66efabf6796b2e4d.jpg
From Y14.5-2018, page 80. (apologies about the scaling). It goes on to say that if a simultaneous requirement is not required, to use a note such as "Sep. Req.", which emphasizes that this is the default behaviour.

ISO, however, does not require this by default.

I think the intent reasonably clear - it is equivalent to a profile with a tolerance of 1.8(U)0.3 to the same datum reference frame. If this is an asme drawing, I would consider it strange and ambiguous, to the point of being wrong, and contact the design authority for clarification if possible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to view this quote.

Thanks for the correction, citation David. I was mixed up 11.6.1.3 Each horizontal segment in the fcf should be verified separately

only applies to composite frtz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...