[Wo...] Posted September 23 Author Share Posted September 23 Please sign in to view this quote. From what I've seen so far it fixes the issue of automatic feature recognition when manually probing (used to be minutes before the hit registered), but the slow running of the plans is still there. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Wo...] Posted September 30 Author Share Posted September 30 Downloading with fingers crossed: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Wo...] Posted September 30 Author Share Posted September 30 (edited) Please sign in to view this quote. FYI no difference in simulation. EDIT - why only some posts can be edited? I couldn't add info to the above post. Edited September 30 Can't edit other post 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[No...] Posted September 30 Share Posted September 30 Please sign in to view this quote. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ch...] Posted October 1 Share Posted October 1 Can the new Calypso already be used productively, or should one wait a little longer? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Wo...] Posted October 1 Author Share Posted October 1 VAST XT has no issues AFAIK, it's the rotational systems that are problematic. In retrospect, I would probably be better of staying at 7.8. My biggest issue with 7.8 is that the XTR doesn't rotate in simulation. It does rotate in 8.0, but the whole simulation is broken so it doesn't really help 😉 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ch...] Posted October 1 Share Posted October 1 Hasn't this problem been known for a long time? Isn't Zeiss doing anything about it? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[No...] Posted October 2 Share Posted October 2 (edited) I always wonder how major bugs like this make it into a release version unnoticed (or are they? 🤔). It's starting to feel like the game market: Years of development and postponed release dates, but the final product still s*cks. Edited October 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Lu...] Posted Thursday at 03:01 PM Share Posted Thursday at 03:01 PM Is simulation the main issue with 8.0 or are there other issues? I am in the process of updating 2 cmms to 2025 and am wondering if i should go a version down instead. We don't use simulation on these cmms so if that is the main issue then it would still work for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Cr...] Posted Thursday at 04:59 PM Share Posted Thursday at 04:59 PM There is still serious lag time between measured features. It almost doubled the measuring time on a few tests we've done. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ka...] Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago We will receive another DuraMax at the beginning of December, this time with CALYPSO 8.0. Neither the sales department nor the technical sales department is aware of any problems with CALYPSO 8.0. We are developing on 7.4.24, which should be 100% compatible with 8.0. they say. Only the local PiWeb data will not be compatible. I am very concerned about receiving a version that belongs in intensive care rather than in production. Fingers crossed that a usable service pack will be released by December. I am speechless about the poor quality of 8.0. Probably tested at the last Oktoberfest by ZEISS... Regards Karsten 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago I've been using 8.0 for a while, and other than the simulation issue I haven't really experienced any other issues. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Je...] Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago Please sign in to view this username. , I echo Richard. Other than the simulation issue, I have not experienced major problems in 8.0. To the contrary, I've been delighted by quite a few noteworthy improvements and new capabilities. The simulation issue, however, is a major problem, and not just because of the functional inadequacy. Zeiss's silence and lack of customer care on the issue is perhaps even more problematic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in